triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Why BMW Kept Triumph IMHO

To: tr6@mac.com, triumphs@autox.team.net
Subject: Why BMW Kept Triumph IMHO
From: "John Vance" <biggooner@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 08:58:00 -0400 FILETIME=[829E0C50:01C15C8B]
Let's put the romanticism to sleep. BMW are highly unlikely to resurrect the 
Triumph name. As well as the idea that the Triumph name might reappear on 
BMW made cars there was also speculation that BMW would use the name to 
manufacture parts for us poor lost souls. Not a chance (as the recent sale 
underlines). No business case there whatsoever.

The only plausible (and very BMWesque) reason for holding on to the name 
(and I think they kept Austin Healey as well) is to prevent a resurgent 
MG-Rover building cars for sale in the US where Triumph retains credible 
brand equity and thereby competing against their own sports cars. Or to 
prevent MG/R fom reselling the brand to someone like Ford's PAG. Jaguar, 
Land Rover, Aston Martin... and Triumph. Nice thought....

John Vance
74 TR6 - online
72 Stag - system testing
71 Stag - decommissioned
West Chester, PA


_________________________________________________________________

///  triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list
///  To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
///  with nothing in it but
///
///     unsubscribe triumphs
///
///  or try  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Why BMW Kept Triumph IMHO, John Vance <=