triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: DVM

To: "'John & Patricia Donnelly'" <pdonnel1@san.rr.com>, <ZinkZ10C@aol.com>, <geneglenn@qwest.net>, "'triumphs@autox.team.net'" <triumphs@Autox.Team.Net>
Subject: RE: DVM
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 20:37:02 -0700
Sometimes the best tool for electrical troubleshooting is a simple probe
light!  :)

Joe

-----Original Message-----
From owner-triumphs at Autox.Team.Net
[mailto:owner-triumphs@Autox.Team.Net] On Behalf Of John & Patricia
Donnelly
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 7:39 PM
To: 'ZinkZ10C@aol.com'; geneglenn@qwest.net; triumphs@autox.team.net
Subject: RE: DVM

I'm sorry, but I disagree. An analog meter is much preferable to
troubleshoot 
car problems. You can watch varying voltages/currents/continuity that a
DVM (or 
DMM) can't. You can see any inductance/capacitance issues in wiring, if
a diode 
works properly, the timing of open/close of relays/switches much better.
A DMM 
is good if you REALLY know what you're doing, and already know and can 
interpret analog actions into digital form.

As far as loading down a circuit, a meter is rated in ohms/volt. This is
the 
amount of parallel resistance the meter applies when you place the leads
on the 
terminals. BOTH the cheapy digital and analog versions are normally
rated at 
around 20K ohm/volt. More expensive meters are higher. The higher the
better, 
since less current is drawn through the meter and normally will mean
more 
accurate measurements. So a cheap analog meter won't load a circuit any
more 
than a cheap digital version.

I have both in my tool box, but gravitate to an analog version in most
cases.

Thanks!
John


-----Original Message-----
From:   ZinkZ10C@aol.com [SMTP:ZinkZ10C@aol.com]
Sent:   Tuesday, October 12, 2004 11:34 AM
To:     geneglenn@qwest.net; triumphs@autox.team.net
Subject:        Re: DVM

In a message dated 10/12/04 12:26:44 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
geneglenn@qwest.net writes:

<< OK people: what's a DVM.
   >>

Digital Volt Meter AKA  DMM Digital Multi Meter

The advantage is no needle on the meter to get damaged, usually better
accuracy and no load placed on the circuit you are measuring.

The down side is since the meter does not load the circuit, stray
voltage
will make you think the circuit has full power but it does not.  If you
are
measuring battery state of charge, a oxygen sensor or other computer car

sensor,
the DVM is better.  If you are just trouble shooting a wiper circuit, a
test
light is better because it load the circuit.

Harold

Check out the new British Cars Forum:
http://www.team.net/the-local/tiki-view_forum.php?forumId=8




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>