triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TR] Reality check

To: "Bob" <yellowtr@adelphia.net>, <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [TR] Reality check
From: "FRED E THOMAS" <frede.thomas2@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:39:04 -0400
Only speaking of the "emissions testing" law here in Virginia, the emissions 
must be up to the standards of the "Year of Manufacture", to expect a 1959 
Triumph to meet 20010 standards would sure wipe out any and "ALL" antique" 
autos, the hobbie would be finished.  FT
=============================================================================================================
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bob" <yellowtr@adelphia.net>
To: <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 8:24 AM
Subject: Re: [TR] Reality check


> On Thursday 20 August 2009 09:06:32 pm P Caffrey wrote:
>> I remember long ago when I had to get my TR4A smogged and certified.  I
>> took it to a mechanic that knew these cars.  He'd fiddle with it and it
>> would pass.  I also remember him telling me that the car passed smog
>> inspection but was probably one of the dirtiest cars on the road.  I
>> suspect CA, TR owners have the most to worry about regarding 
>> "progressive"
>> legislation.  We CAs love to be on the "cutting edge"....I can't help but
>> wonder, too, that there are many old car enthusiasts across car lines.
>> When or if push comes to shove, TR folks could align themselves with
>> Chevrolet, Ford, etc enthusiasts to help block unwelcome legislation.  I
>> wonder how many old car enthusiasts are out there, especially in CA? 
>> Also,
>> it would be interesting to know how many legislators/politicians have
>> vintage cars.
>>
>>
> Here in NY state, cars older than 1995 do not have to pass smog 
> inspections.
> Could that change? I dont think so. The current emissions test is 
> performed by
> computer, not a sensor on the tail pipe. Cars older than 95 dont have the
> ability.
>
> But as everyone in this country can attest, we are slowly getting 
> regulated to
> death.
>
> I currently drive a 58 TR3, 63 TR4 and a 1974 Bonneville that could never 
> pass
> current emissions tests. And with a 72 TR6 to be completed in about a year 
> or
> so with some modifications to the engine, I doubt that car would pass as 
> well.
>
> I believe the vintage car industry is just too large for the government to
> shut it down. Sales, parts, cottage industries supplying parts and 
> upgrades.
> Doesn't make a whole lot of sense to shut it down because of a little co2 
> and
> some no2. How much do we contribute to the total tail pipe emissions? Most
> likely cant be measured.
>
> Well, I am going in the garage and try to get some work done on the 6.
>
> Bob
> _______________________________________________
>
> Support Team.Net  http://www.team.net/donate.html
>
> This list supported in part by the Vintage Triumph Register
> http://www.vtr.org
>
>
> Triumphs@autox.team.net
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/triumphs
>
>
> http://www.team.net/archive 
_______________________________________________

Support Team.Net  http://www.team.net/donate.html

This list supported in part by the Vintage Triumph Register
http://www.vtr.org


Triumphs@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/triumphs


http://www.team.net/archive

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>