| To: | John Innis <jdinnis@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TR] Off Topic Code Reader |
| From: | Doug Mathews <mathews@uga.edu> |
| Date: | Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:02:18 -0500 |
| Cc: | Truiumphs <triumphs@autox.team.net> |
| Delivered-to: | mharc@autox.team.net |
| Delivered-to: | triumphs@autox.team.net |
| References: | <8D0E02EDC76D005-EF4-6A0CE@webmail-m284.sysops.aol.com> <8D0E02FA3A23BA4-EF4-6A186@webmail-m284.sysops.aol.com> <84CFC3D49FAD460FA3179E8E20B421A9@UserTHINK> <CANzE1bEf6TWuk39wput1aJZkxm6GC0E90vpUtEUB=mW3aZn_LA@mail.gmail.com> <5639C846994E413CA7DB147EABF70CF5@livingroompc> <52D90FC4.1010201@uga.edu> <CANuE7YAkPn_kmLywUeAMDFptr3-r=oG=NSi0MdHaKtHSgHHZAA@mail.gmail.com> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 |
Good point. On 1/17/2014 9:43 AM, John Innis wrote: > The biggest downfall of this approach is that you only get the code, > not the sensor data. -- p.s. I do not use a smart phone so if you email me and do not get a quick response it is not because I am ignoring you. Just not at a computer. ** triumphs@autox.team.net ** Archive: http://www.team.net/archive |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TR] Off Topic Code Reader, John Innis |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TR] Off Topic Code Reader, Randall |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TR] Off Topic Code Reader, John Innis |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TR] Off Topic Code Reader, Randall |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |