triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TR] Aluminum radiator

To: "Andrew Uprichard" <auprichard@uprichard.net>, <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [TR] Aluminum radiator
From: "Dixie4" <dixie4.wales@virgin.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 05:32:42 +0100
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: triumphs@autox.team.net
References: <006d01cfe7f4$674e1280$35ea3780$@uprichard.net>
Hi Andrew,

Extra cooling is an advantage. Three row will have extra capacity in reserve 
if and when needed.
Under normal use you will never know the difference as the thermostat 
controls the running temperature.
Aluminium/Aluminum radiators are more efficient and durable.

Go for it, three row that is, not forgetting a higher mix of 
antifreeze/anticorrosion additive. Possibly 50/50.
Aluminium/Aluminum does not like plain water although radiators are of an 
alloy so do not suffer from this problem as much as alloy engines. Belts and 
braces spring to mind.

Adrian,
1966 TR4A CT64306 O
Wales, UK
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andrew Uprichard" <auprichard@uprichard.net>
To: <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 10:18 PM
Subject: [TR] Aluminum radiator


> Thinking about an aluminum radiator for a TR3 project and see several from
> China on eBay.  Questions - does anyone out there have experience with any
> of these? And for a standard engine is there any advantage of the 
> three-row
> radiators versus two-row?
>
> Andrew Uprichard
>
> Nothing but  TR3s right now.
>
> ** triumphs@autox.team.net **
>
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> Unsubscribe/Manage: 
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/triumphs/dixie4.wales@virgin.net
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2014.0.4765 / Virus Database: 4040/8388 - Release Date: 10/14/14

** triumphs@autox.team.net **

Archive: http://www.team.net/archive

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>