triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TR] Bardahl oil additive

To: John Macartney <john.macartney@ukpips.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [TR] Bardahl oil additive
From: Brad Kahler <bkahler1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:18:58 -0400
Cc: Triumphs <Triumphs@autox.team.net>
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: triumphs@autox.team.net
References: <CADm3DLEgwA1fB5HdMr_-GQRT8jMkRHc+EjeCW1ftYQPP5E+p2Q@mail.gmail.com> <009e01cfed34$3b1b2230$b1516690$@ukpips.org.uk>
Jonmac, your comments basically match what I am thinking.  I'm going to
change the bearings and thrust washers and move on to the next item on my
hit list :)

Brad


On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:37 AM, John Macartney <
john.macartney@ukpips.org.uk> wrote:

> Brad
>
> I think you'll get an endless variation of thoughts on this one. I've heard
> of Bardahl down the years, though never seen it on sale in the UK. My guess
> is it has helpful anti-wear additives in it that might well have been
> beneficial 30 or more years back when engine oils were not nearly as
> sophisticated as today. It seems to make similar claims to another product
> called Molyslip which had a high content of molybdenum disulphide. Moly was
> OK in engines but not anywhere where there were non-ferrous metals. But
> back
> in the day, I vaguely recall you used Bardahl / Molyslip / STP in an engine
> that had some wear. If put in a new engine that had hardly bedded down was
> counter-productive and actually inhibited the essential 'wearing out'
> process that's so vital in the first few thousand miles. When you get the
> car running again, I think I'd just use the oil you plan to adopt without
> an
> additive though I have no thoughts on the ZDDP aspects as it's not an issue
> for  us on this side of the pond.
>
> Jonmac
>
>
> ---
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
> protection is active.
> http://www.avast.com

** triumphs@autox.team.net **

Archive: http://www.team.net/archive

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>