triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

[Fot] TR3 Exhaust

Subject: [Fot] TR3 Exhaust
From: riverside at southslope.net (riverside at southslope.net)
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 10:07:18 -0500
References: <763430162.1373843.1524777877900@mail.yahoo.com> <1630501014c-c88-17d50@webjas-vac104.srv.aolmail.net>
I recently built up  a ?36 Dodge flathead 6  split exhaust
Elgin cam,  offy tein carb intake etc., etc,  with two
smitty style mufflers and the sound was out of this
world.  Even better than the 4.2 Jag with smittys I had
years ago.

From: Bill Dentinger via Fot 
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2018 9:49 PM
To: fot at autox.team.net 
Subject: Re: [Fot] TR3 Exhaust

Hi Jack... 

Sounds like the Classic 'Smitty Flow Through' that used crack, pop, and bang 
after you burned them out (especially in 2nd gear coasting down hill.)

Hope you are well.

Bill Dentinger

Sent from AOL Mobile Mail
Get the new AOL app: mail.mobile.aol.com

On Thursday, April 26, 2018, Jack Wheeler via Fot <fot at autox.team.net> 
wrote: 


  Hi Todd.  I have a TR-2 and TR-3 street cars.  Both have cams, compression 
and are balanced, etc. but not quite "full race", generating about 125 HP.  I 
wanted a system that would sound good, and last many years of street use.  I 
finished restoring my TR-2 in 1992.  I put on a stock stainless steel muffler 
(the TR-2 did not have a resonator), and ran a 2" stainless steel tube out the 
back of the car in the stock location.  When I held up the muffler, and looked 
through it, there were no baffles.  The sound deadening was with material 
packed around the hole going through the middle of the muffler.  I think this 
was pretty much the stock design back in the mid-50's.  The system sounds 
great, looks stock, and after 26 years, no problems, no rust, or other damage.


  I restored my TR-3 in 2012, and did basically the same thing as on my TR-2.  
The stock configuration on the TR-3 included a resonator, but I left it off and 
went with the stainless steel stock muffler and straight pipe out the back.  
Again, it sounds great, looks stock, and has shown no problems.  The sound is a 
little different than the TR-2, but it still sounds great.  The difference may 
be a small design change in the muffler between 1992 and 2012.


  If I did another 4 cylinder TR, I'd do the same thing again.  Good luck.


  Jack



  On Thursday, April 26, 2018, 4:01:39 PM EDT, Todd Redmond via Fot <fot at 
autox.team.net> wrote: 


  Friends:


  I have the header and collector.  I'm looking for what you have done 
  from that point back.


  It's going to be a street-track car.  I've read Kas's book on optimal 
  length/diameter vs power.  I don't think I want a straight pipe. (Maybe 
  I do!)  What's the best sounding and breathing system for these 4 
  bangers?


  Will it sound like 1/3 a Ferrari v12?


  Thanks
  Todd
  _______________________________________________
  fot at autox.team.net

  http://www.fot-racing.com

  Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
  Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot
  Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/jwheeler1947 at 
yahoo.com



  _______________________________________________
  fot at autox.team.net

  http://www.fot-racing.com

  Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
  Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot
  Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/billdentin at 
aol.com





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
fot at autox.team.net

http://www.fot-racing.com

Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2016.0.7639 / Virus Database: 4793/15608 - Release Date: 04/27/18
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot/attachments/20180427/953b1f63/attachment.html>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>