triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TR] TR2-3 electrical melt downs

To: Michael Porter <mdporter@dfn.com>
Subject: Re: [TR] TR2-3 electrical melt downs
From: John Macartney <John.Macartney@Ukpips.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 07:33:41 +0100
Authentication-results: nervenetwebhosting.co.uk; spf=pass (sender IP is 86.165.175.108) smtp.mailfrom=john.macartney@ukpips.org.uk smtp.helo=[192.168.1.161]
Cc: "triumphs@autox.team.net" <triumphs@autox.team.net>, "fot@autox.team.net" <fot@autox.team.net>
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: triumphs@autox.team.net
References: <35829924.2130934.1593009476585@mail.yahoo.com> <D9CFAC72-FBD8-49C6-927B-25AE81D3DF4F@yahoo.com> <B8FE5516-FC7A-4912-981A-04A26292BBF8@Ukpips.org.uk> <933f36d8-2f91-ba76-19ba-10d23ae96a75@dfn.com> <CAPK7CFC3JjkJoB3zxDk=QHF=mycrrT=HfPSiV5r5A3Z4oxcJJg@mail.gmail.com> <fda45f19-c475-f56d-c3bc-2417483f3346@dfn.com>
Thatâ??s it, cadmium was banned. But what did they use as an alternative? 
Sorry, memory banks voided!

Donâ??s query about whether the different looms applied to sidescreen TR? 
Possibly. Sweden changed its rule of the road from rhs to LHD in about 1963. 
However, several years before that change, vehicles to meet the new standard 
were being shipped there and their specifications often included future planned 
features effective from a future date. As an example, hazard warning flashers 
were mandatory as Federal spec from 1968 or 69 for the US. Several other 
countries were planning to make these a legal requirement at later dates but it 
made sense to line fit them to all cars regardless. Perhaps if Bror Hultgren 
Triumph Club of Sweden is still on this list he can provide an answer?

Jonmac

At the Battle of Waterloo, 1815:
Lord Uxbridge:  â??By God, Sir - Iâ??ve lost my legâ??
Duke of Wellington: â??By God, Sir - so you have!â??


> On 25 Jun 2020, at 05:32, Michael Porter <mdporter@dfn.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 6/24/2020 10:25 PM, Don Hiscock wrote:
>> I might have thought cadmium too, Michael.
>> 
> A better guess than mine, actually, since cad plate was in very common use 
> and produces toxic fumes when heated.  And while zinc chromate was available, 
> it was more expensive, so, cadmium plating would be a prime candidate.
> 
> Good catch.
> 
> 
> Cheers.
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> Michael Porter
> Roswell, NM
> 
> 
> Never let anyone drive you crazy when you know it's within walking 
> distance....
> 
> 

** triumphs@autox.team.net **

Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/triumphs  http://www.team.net/archive

Unsubscribe/Manage: 
http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/triumphs/mharc@autox.team.net
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>