[Alpines] pointless? AccuSpark

[Peter Chadbund]

In my opinion replacing the points and condenser should be the priority. 
Using the points to switch the electronic circuitry has the advantage of 
reducing the load on the points thus reducing the electrical wear. They will 
still need regular checking as the mechanical parts will still wear the 
same. The points and coil ht system is an antiquated design, but part of the 
quirkiness of our vehicles, so I would say, if reliability and daily use are 
prime considerations, fit an electronic system that replaces the points with 
a solid-state device (or just replace the points for a cheaper almost as 
effective alternative). Having talked to people who have fitted electronic 
ignition units, their claims to improved fuel consumption and performance 
can usually be attributed to a greater tolerance in the setting of the 
points etc., the timing of the  electronic unit being less critical.

Pete

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "TTynan" <ttynan at iol.ie>
To: "Peter Chadbund" <peter at wizardclassics.co.uk>
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 9:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Alpines] pointless? AccuSpark


> Peter
> I have one of these, not yet fitted. It retains the existing point and is 
> switchable between the two states in the event of the ubit's failure. Has 
> no CD discharge circuitry.  Is it rue that true electronic with the 4- 
> magnet choper a bad design?
> Thanks
> TT
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Peter Chadbund" <peter at wizardclassics.co.uk>
> To: <alpines at autox.team.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 4:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [Alpines] pointless? AccuSpark
>
>
>> However I do believe it is worth fitting a solid-state replacement for 
>> the points, as these and the associated condenser, are the weak points in 
>> the system. I bought a very cheap set off ebay which when health and 
>> weather allow, I intend to fit to my wife's Alpine ser 5.
>> Pete