[Fot] 89MM piston question

tr4racing at googlemail.com tr4racing at googlemail.com
Wed Sep 5 06:56:14 MDT 2018


Hi Marcel,

 

inertia of the engine and the drive train influent the results at very high power figures >500 hp, wenn the rolls of the dyno get accelerated very quickly.

The TR engines are not powerful enough it takes several seconds to shift the revs on a run from 2000 to 7000 so the inertia is not a thing to care about.

 

Cheers

Chris

 

Von: Fot <fot-bounces at autox.team.net> Im Auftrag von van.mulders.marcel--- via Fot
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. September 2018 10:34
An: Jim Gray <toodamnfunky at comcast.net>
Cc: fot <fot at autox.team.net>
Betreff: Re: [Fot] 89MM piston question

 

It seems I've a chance someone here knows what the inertia is of the rotating parts of a (standard) TR4 and TR6 engine?

 

PS : most chassis dyno's are measuring horsepower out of the acceleration of the very heavy cylinders (great inertia). The  wheels of the car are resting on these cylinders and accelerate them during the runs. But the engine has also to accelerate the rotating parts of the car(crank, transmission, wheels..). I suppose that the dyno operator has to make a guess of the  inertia value of these parts and add it to the inertia of the cylinders. Here is a comfortable opportunity for the operator to make the customer happy : if he is adding an exaggerated  number for the inertia of the rotating parts of the car, then the horsepower is exaggerated. As far as I know , chassis dyno operators never mention or ask about the car inertia. It would be very interesting though to know the value he is using, because then you can always use this same value for runs on different occasions and compare the results a bit better. A chassis dyno is really only usefull to compare the results of changing things on the engine during one and the same session.Don't be fooled by the absolute numbers : Once I went to a chassis dyno with my TR3 :  my car must have looked pitiful against the modern cars the operator was normally testing, because the result was 210 bhp at the wheels and I knew it surely had no more than 180 bhp at the flywheel! I don't know if some chassis dyno's have a brake to hold the engine on a constant rpm at WOT : then the inertia of dyno and car doesn't matter and you know the right horsepower at the wheels. About right at least : you can cheat yourself a bit by overinflating the tyres and the dyno has still to be calibrated rightly.

Marcel

 

  _____  

Van: "fot" <fot at autox.team.net <mailto:fot at autox.team.net> >
Aan: "Bill" <Bill at ponostyle.com <mailto:Bill at ponostyle.com> >, "Larry Young" <cartravel at pobox.com <mailto:cartravel at pobox.com> >
Cc: "fot" <fot at autox.team.net <mailto:fot at autox.team.net> >
Verzonden: Woensdag 5 september 2018 02:44:00
Onderwerp: Re: [Fot] 89MM piston question

 

You mean something like this ? Measured on a chassis dyno. The notes on the left are the suggested power train loss

as described by the dyno shop. But, whatever the final numbers are in truth the 5250 mark is right there.

This was the comaprison to my 2015 engine spec.

I shouldn’t have advanced that cam me thinks.

jim g

 



 

From: Fot <fot-bounces at autox.team.net <mailto:fot-bounces at autox.team.net> > On Behalf Of Bill via Fot
Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2018 3:08 PM
To: Larry Young <cartravel at pobox.com <mailto:cartravel at pobox.com> >
Cc: fot at autox.team.net <mailto:fot at autox.team.net> 
Subject: Re: [Fot] 89MM piston question

 

I’m being a bit facetious, I understand what people mean (sort of)  but I’ve heard “Horsepower wins sales, torque wins races.” and the equivalent spoken or written sagely, with solemn nods all around, too many times not to comment. One is a functional equivalent of the other, both in a mathematical and practical sense. The relationship is linear. Torque is force. Horsepower includes a circular distance component to express work. 

 

As you say, the numbers for the power and torque curves should equate at every point (adjusted by the function). The fact that they often don’t is ridiculous—horsepower measured by a dyno is calculated from torque and RPM, not directly measured. The shorthand bullshit detector for dyno curves expressed in Imperial units of ft-lbs and horsepower is to see if the curves cross at 5252 RPM. Many don’t, including those published in car magazines. 

 

Sheesh. 

 

 

On Sep 4, 2018, at 9:21 AM, Larry Young via Fot <fot at autox.team.net <mailto:fot at autox.team.net> > wrote:

 

P = T*R/5252 
When people talk about a torquey engine, they usually mean it makes its power a low revs. 

I once ran an engine on two different rolling road dynos (a Dynojet and a Mustang Dyno. The guys at the dyno shop said the second one would give less hp because they used a brake in their setup. I said, "you didn't calibrate for that"? They backpedaled and gave me a line of BS. Then the power and torque curves they produced did not agree with the equation. To get an explanation, I worked my way up the chain and eventually talked to the dyno companies head "technical" guy. He said he thought it must be the calibration! I said, "it is basic physics, like saying F = ma". Since then, I have never trusted dyno numbers. Good for comparative tuning runs only and of course, bench racing.
 - Larry

On 9/2/2018 10:46 PM, Bill via Fot wrote:

It always puzzles me when people say that. Horsepower is torque times RPM (and a conversion factor). Torque is horsepower/RPM. So how can one count more than the other? 

 

On Sep 2, 2018, at 4:13 PM, Mordy Dunst via Fot <fot at autox.team.net <mailto:fot at autox.team.net> > wrote:

 

Its the torque that counts.  So, I suspect the motor enhancements took the benefit of the tractor stroke.  If the motor is  able  to produce  that power at 6k rpm with shift at 6500.     

I shift at @ 6200 - my motor produces  max power @5800 on the dyno. I use a kastner designed cam for which  I have the masters. 

 

 

 

MDunst Headgasket.com <http://headgasket.com/>  626.358.1616 <tel:626.358.1616>   

Fax 626.628.3777 <tel:626.628.3777>  

Triple R Munitions, Inc 626.201.9471 <tel:626.201.9471>  

T FFL 6,7 SOT 2

 

On Sunday, September 2, 2018, John Styduhar via Fot <fot at autox.team.net <mailto:fot at autox.team.net> > wrote: 

 

What kind of modifications were done to the engine to extract over 200 HP from a tractor engine?  Nitrous shot.

 

 

On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 3:05 PM Thomas Boyd <tom at trenterprises.com <mailto:tom at trenterprises.com> > wrote:

All of our FIA race cars are running legal 87mm engines.

Just rolling roaded the latest SLR build at well north of 200bhp

Thomas Boyd 

Director

TR Enterprises

01623 793807 (ext 302) <tel:01623%20793807;302> 

www.trenterprises.com <http://www.trenterprises.com/> 

 


On 1 Sep 2018, at 17:02, John Styduhar via Fot <fot at autox.team.net <mailto:fot at autox.team.net> > wrote:

If you really had serious compliance with most group's rules, I would guess half the TR cars would not pass muster.  Let's have fun together.   

 

 

On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 9:40 AM Terry Stetler via Fot <fot at autox.team.net <mailto:fot at autox.team.net> > wrote:

Indeed there are Glen.

 

Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986>  for Windows 10

 


  _____  


From: Fot <fot-bounces at autox.team.net <mailto:fot-bounces at autox.team.net> > on behalf of fubog1 via Fot <fot at autox.team.net <mailto:fot at autox.team.net> >
Sent: Saturday, September 1, 2018 7:34:26 AM
To: rkramer56 at gmail.com <mailto:rkramer56 at gmail.com> 
Cc: fot at autox.team.net <mailto:fot at autox.team.net> 
Subject: Re: [Fot] 89MM piston question 

 

everybody else seems to be using 89.

HaHa not everybody, rules say 87mm, there are still a few guys running them (and winning)...

Glen 

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Kramer via Fot <fot at autox.team.net <mailto:fot at autox.team.net> >
To: van.mulders.marcel <van.mulders.marcel at telenet.be <mailto:van.mulders.marcel at telenet.be> >
Cc: fot <fot at autox.team.net <mailto:fot at autox.team.net> >
Sent: Fri, Aug 31, 2018 11:26 pm
Subject: Re: [Fot] 89MM piston question

I've always used 87 MM due to the rules but everybody else seems to be using 89. The procedures are the same so It'll be the same. I blew a head gasket last time out, compression into the cooling system and blew off the bottom hose. I guess it wasn't tight enough, and scuffed two pistons before I could shut it down. 




Bob Kramer

 

On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 12:43 PM, <van.mulders.marcel at telenet.be <mailto:van.mulders.marcel at telenet.be> > wrote:

Bob,

It is definitely necessary to make that modification to the liners. The relieve should correspond to the shape of the combustion chambers : about 4 mm wide on a 89mm engine.

Marcel

 


  _____  


Van: "fot" <fot at autox.team.net <mailto:fot at autox.team.net> >
Cc: "fot" <fot at autox.team.net <mailto:fot at autox.team.net> >
Verzonden: Donderdag 30 augustus 2018 00:05:43
Onderwerp: [Fot] 89MM piston question

 

Do the guys running the 89MM pistons and liners need to relieve the liners to clear the intake valve, or does the extra MM make the difference?




Bob Kramer

 

On Tue, 


_______________________________________________
fot at autox.team.net <mailto:fot at autox.team.net> 

http://www.fot-racing.com <https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fot-racing.com&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cfb7e0a419784422ba65f08d610099d2f%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636714030802934667&sdata=SWmGSEgBI0WTR%2FLPy2xyAyLox06XFrLP1uOUEEjJQsI%3D&reserved=0> 

Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html <https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.team.net%2Fdonate.html&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cfb7e0a419784422ba65f08d610099d2f%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636714030802934667&sdata=bwtZvpeCDT54Mf386NikjfQm6iL6gSbojCj6LMprugk%3D&reserved=0> 
Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot <https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.team.net%2Fpipermail%2Ffot&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cfb7e0a419784422ba65f08d610099d2f%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636714030803090929&sdata=bGtgg6p9%2FupNqhAQlkI%2FB0nJPSDj7dg31xvI0AOXMUY%3D&reserved=0> 
Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/van.mulders.marcel@telenet.be <https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fautox.team.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Ffot%2Fvan.mulders.marcel%40telenet.be&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cfb7e0a419784422ba65f08d610099d2f%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636714030803090929&sdata=bBrUpAuO7h8B4XMaxfIeBhXngIWPYAeehbhSW6PQcB0%3D&reserved=0> 

 

_______________________________________________
fot at autox.team.net <mailto:fot at autox.team.net> 

http://www.fot-racing.com <https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fot-racing.com&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cfb7e0a419784422ba65f08d610099d2f%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636714030803090929&sdata=E7BslARTM9N9eIGRlESX76OWzXi5EtbuunX103bteG8%3D&reserved=0> 

Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html <https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.team.net%2Fdonate.html&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cfb7e0a419784422ba65f08d610099d2f%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636714030803090929&sdata=MN6FZr9p7o90tMhq9SE93ZuzKDpC3jNDQB7eljZkWag%3D&reserved=0> 
Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot <https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.team.net%2Fpipermail%2Ffot&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cfb7e0a419784422ba65f08d610099d2f%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636714030803090929&sdata=bGtgg6p9%2FupNqhAQlkI%2FB0nJPSDj7dg31xvI0AOXMUY%3D&reserved=0> 
Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/fubog1@aol.com <https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fautox.team.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Ffot%2Ffubog1%40aol.com&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cfb7e0a419784422ba65f08d610099d2f%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636714030803090929&sdata=9RxAJTlSbhfi1GxRVXAaBQKql1fIj3Xe8Te5AUXq%2Fzc%3D&reserved=0> 

_______________________________________________
fot at autox.team.net <mailto:fot at autox.team.net> 

http://www.fot-racing.com <http://www.fot-racing.com/> 

Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot
Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/johnstydo@gmail.com

_______________________________________________
fot at autox.team.net <mailto:fot at autox.team.net> 

http://www.fot-racing.com <http://www.fot-racing.com/> 

Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot
Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/tom@trenterprises.com

_______________________________________________
fot at autox.team.net <mailto:fot at autox.team.net> 

http://www.fot-racing.com <http://www.fot-racing.com/> 

Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot
Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/gasket.works@gte.net

_______________________________________________
fot at autox.team.net <mailto:fot at autox.team.net> 

http://www.fot-racing.com <http://www.fot-racing.com/> 

Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot
Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/bill@ponostyle.com






_______________________________________________
fot at autox.team.net <mailto:fot at autox.team.net> 
 
http://www.fot-racing.com <http://www.fot-racing.com/> 
 
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot
Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/cartravel@pobox.com
 
 

 

_______________________________________________
fot at autox.team.net <mailto:fot at autox.team.net> 

http://www.fot-racing.com

Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot
Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/bill@ponostyle.com

 


_______________________________________________
fot at autox.team.net <mailto:fot at autox.team.net> 

http://www.fot-racing.com

Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot
Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/van.mulders.marcel@telenet.be

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot/attachments/20180905/b22c3515/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 306975 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot/attachments/20180905/b22c3515/attachment-0003.png>


More information about the Fot mailing list