[Fot] Fwd: Crown and pinion gear break in

Mon Sep 17 06:00:14 MDT 2018

>From the pictures, I see melted teeth, not broken. It also looks like the front pinion bearing may have spun on the shaft. The ring gear is not nearly as worn as the pinion. I have seen this melting teeth trick and pattern only once before and it was caused by loss of fluid. I used to keep the melted pinion but have lost it over the past two moves.
Barry

      From: Greg Blake via Fot <fot at autox.team.net>
 To: Fot <fot at autox.team.net> 
 Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2018 8:53 PM
 Subject: Re: [Fot] Fwd: Crown and pinion gear break in

I meant to say, looking at the gear mesh, I thought I was close. In fact I started closer to 0.731 pinion depth and reduced it until I got a better mesh pattern. 

Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 16, 2018, at 1:47 PM, Greg Blake via Fot <fot at autox.team.net> wrote:

Here are my setup notes and a few photos from the failed unit. 
Backlash averaged 0.0055” measured at 4 locations 90 degrees apart each. Largest being 0.006 smallest 0.005. 
Depth from bottom of saddle to top of pinion head 0.726”. 
Pictures of gear mesh with this setup. 
Picture of failed pinion gear. 

And companion ring gear. 

I made a hell of a mess.
It looks like I set the pinion too deep into the case by the write ups I’ve reviewed. But looking at the gear mess, it looks like I was pretty close. 
What do y’all think?
Thanks. 
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 13, 2018, at 3:45 PM, Michael Porter <mdporter at dfn.com> wrote:

On 9/13/2018 4:52 AM, Greg Blake wrote:

 Speaking of pattern, Chris mentioned that the Bastuck gear sets are Oerlikon as opposed to Gleason gears. Apparently they require a different mesh pattern. Does anyone have a good resource for pictures of the proper mesh pattern for the Oerlikon type gears?  I can not find one. I contacted Bastuck with no luck there.  
  This might help:

https://www.cartechbooks.com/techtips/ring-and-pinion-gear-selection-for-optimal-performance/

 Note that in the section on hobbed gears (Oerlikon type), I think the first photo has the toe and heel conditions reversed in the description, and it looks to me as if they're using the same set of photos for both types of gear (the hobbed gear has uniform tooth height and the top of the tooth changes thickness from heel to toe, while the milled gear has non-uniform tooth height and uniform tooth thickness at the top, but to me, the dimensions of the teeth look the same in both sets of photos).  There's also general recommendations on break-in.

 This is the closest I've come to finding a comparison of the meshing of the two types, even if it has errors, and some shortcuts in the descriptions.  This, though, is simpler, and might be helpful:

 http://canadawideparts.com/downloads/dana_tooth_pattern.pdf

 Truthfully, I don't see much difference in the two sets of examples.  With regard to set-up, the crucial difference in the two types is where optimum tooth thickness occurs in relation to optimum backlash.  One thing that these guides don't say is that hypoid gears, whether with standard helical pinions or worm-gear pinions, don't tolerate lack of backlash.  I once worked in the shipping department of Boston Digital in Massachusetts as a lowly temp back in the mid-`80s, and my boss was grumbling about how the company was in trouble and it was going to affect his profit-sharing.  So, what happened?  "Big troubles with the fifth-axis on the 5-axis milling machines."  And?  "They use a hypoid worm and ring gear to operate it and it's failing early."  And?  "The engineers don't understand why."  It turned out that they'd set up the ring gear set to zero backlash to eliminate the slop in the gear set because the encoders they were using couldn't compensate, and, of course, the gears wore out prematurely, and because none of them had an automotive background, they didn't understand that they'd created the failure themselves through bad design.  And, they were Indian, like the rest of management, and the culture in India is that the upper classes are never wrong, so they simply couldn't acknowledge that they'd  created the problem.  The answer was to use absolute measurement such as flexible glass rules (which require no correction) and add backlash, but I don't know that they ever did that.

 Cheers.
 -- 

Michael Porter
Roswell, NM

Never let anyone drive you crazy when you know it's within walking distance.... 
_______________________________________________
fot at autox.team.net

http://www.fot-racing.com

Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot
Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/gblake58tr3@icloud.com

_______________________________________________
fot at autox.team.net

http://www.fot-racing.com

Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot
Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/britcars@bellsouth.net

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot/attachments/20180917/449c8ea3/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image4.jpeg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1415285 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot/attachments/20180917/449c8ea3/attachment-0012.jpeg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image3.jpeg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 668619 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot/attachments/20180917/449c8ea3/attachment-0013.jpeg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image2.jpeg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 774138 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot/attachments/20180917/449c8ea3/attachment-0014.jpeg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image1.jpeg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 784434 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot/attachments/20180917/449c8ea3/attachment-0015.jpeg>