[Healeys] electrc fan vs. belt drive
Michael Salter
msalter at precisionsportscar.com
Mon Feb 2 19:52:05 MST 2009
For the fan to absorb 7% of the engine's power that 7% say 10 BHP would have
to be driven by the single "A" sectopm "V" belt..
The last time I looked it usually takes a pair of "A" section belts to drive
1/2 a horsepower!!
Michael Salter
100 (1953) #174
AHX12 (1953)
Bugeye (1961)
http://www.netbug.net/blogmichael/?p=432
-----Original Message-----
From: healeys-bounces at autox.team.net [mailto:healeys-bounces at autox.team.net]
On Behalf Of PG
Sent: February 2, 2009 3:25 PM
To: 'healeys'
Subject: [Healeys] electrc fan vs. belt drive
I'm also on a Triumph forum where a few people have claimed that the
installation of an electric cooling fan (and elimination of belt drive fan)
has increased their Power by about 7%.
They claim that the drag created by the fan on the waterpump pulley creates
a power loss that is more than the power loss due to the burden on the
Alternator/generator created by the electric fan.
Anybody have any thoughts?
Paul
More information about the Healeys
mailing list