[Healeys] Interesting Healey

[Randy Hicks]

Does anyone one have or seen good photos of the chassis plate or batch body plates on this car?  What are the numbers?

I’m skeptical.

Randy

Randy Hicks
AHCA 100 Registrar


> On Mar 21, 2015, at 4:15 AM, Derek Job <derek.c.job at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I believe the car is what it says it is and that Healey Museum have some original drawings and documents that pertain to the car.
> 
> Derek
> 
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 5:51 AM, Alan Seigrist <healey.nut at gmail.com <mailto:healey.nut at gmail.com>> wrote:
> It looks like Austin did a pretty nice job of treatment around the roll up windows keeping the roadster lines but I guess they brought it up a bit higher on the BJ7 and BJ8 because of the collapsed height of the convertible top:
> 
> http://www.classic-auctions.com/Auctions/21-07-2010-ThePavilionGardens-1259/1953Austin-Healey100Prototype-31691.aspx# <http://www.classic-auctions.com/Auctions/21-07-2010-ThePavilionGardens-1259/1953Austin-Healey100Prototype-31691.aspx#>
> 
> I also like the quarter lights (but these ones are fixed, looks like), they are very elegant.
> 
> Looks like a perspex roll up window, which would make sense for a prototype.
> 
> Yes, the holes on the side are pretty ugly, even if it was done at Austin for whatever reason I would get rid of them on principle.
> 
> Alan
> 
> 
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 1:45 PM, John Spaur <jmsdarch at sbcglobal.net <mailto:jmsdarch at sbcglobal.net>> wrote:
> So… what’s up with three holes on the starboard side and two on the port side?
> 
>  
> 
> John
> 
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://autox.team.net/pipermail/healeys/attachments/20150321/e0559288/attachment.html>