[Healeys] 100M Back on BaT

[S and T Miller]

Bob, I agree with you. And it seems he is trying to cast some doubt on it being a BN1 chassis. Saying the firewall is a combination of both BN1 and BN2 is plain false. Since I was the one who showed him in person why it was a BN1 chassis he wanted to use my name saying we "believe" its a BN1 chassis,  and I replied that "believe" doesn't categorize my opinion. That everything points to being a BN1 chassis and nothing to a BN2.
Intesting note on the added restoration photos, #311 clearly shows the cut out BN1 gearbox mount in the restoration photo. Odd it is on a painted frame, but the BN2 one must have been welded in later. I'd thought maybe it was of a different frame, but the front frame extensions are missing in the pictured one as we'll, so probably not.

I realize he is trying to sell a car that he bought that someone misrepresented to him,  but I kinda feel not so great about his representation of the car on BAT. Again it is a nice car overall.

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2023 03:45:57 -0800
From: Bob Spidell <bspidell at comcast.net>
To: healeys at autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [Healeys] 100M Back on BaT
Message-ID: <229b7fa6-3b3a-4221-b587-227de3ae0c2b at comcast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"

The expos? of the incorrect frame isn't stated in the text, but buried
in the video according to a commenter (I didn't watch it). It appears to
me the seller is attempting to straddle an ethical fence, apparently
with BaT's blessing

The Millers

"Always drive them, but remember each drive in an antique car is a test drive."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://autox.team.net/pipermail/healeys/attachments/20231227/b41ab86e/attachment.htm>