[Mgs] [Mgb-v8] Kendall Oil

Stephen West-fisher steve at coastaldatasystems.com
Wed Sep 23 18:16:06 MDT 2009


Of course, all those flat tappet engines before the late '60s did just fine
with .08% or less ZDDP :-)
And one of the current oil tests for the standard is how well it performs in
a V6 flat tappet engine.

--
Stephen West-Fisher
Coastal Data Systems
727.599.4271
http://www.coastaldatasystems.com/

-----Original Message-----
From: mgs-bounces at autox.team.net [mailto:mgs-bounces at autox.team.net] On
Behalf Of Paul Hunt
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 9:09 AM
To: Steven Trovato; MG List
Subject: Re: [Mgs] [Mgb-v8] Kendall Oil

That's just not correct, it's like saying if 0W/40 fully synthetic is right
for high-performance modern engines it must be good enough for ours, which
is
definitely *not* correct.  There is more than enough evidence out there from
*owners* that modern, low ZDDP oils cause problems, see
http://www.ttalk.info/Zddp.htm and http://lnengineering.com/oil.html#Z13.
The
fact that you can quote sources that say SM is fine, and I can quote others
which say it isn't, just goes to show how confusing the whole subject is.
It
is a fact that modern Diesel oils have a higher level of protection, and so
conform to the earlier petrol grades, precisely because Diesel engines need
more protection for the little ends than SM can give, similar to flat-tappet
engines.


More information about the Mgs mailing list