[Shotimes] OT: Digital Camera ? - 3.1MP overkill for internet work?

[Paul L Fisher]

Overkill for internet, yes. As a matter of fact, a cheap digital camera
($100) is overkill for posting on the internet.

You just have to decide what the increase in resolution is worth. In my
book, it isn't.

Paul L Fisher
'93 Ford Taurus SHO Crimson Clearcoat ATX 167K Build date 11/18/1992
- K&N Panel filter, Tokico Struts, Eibach Springs, Dynomax cat-back, Holley
190lph fuel pump, FPS rebuilt ATX, 26mm rear sway bar, Performance-Plus
Stainless Steel Y-pipe, Delrin sub-frame bushings, Amsoil Series 2000 0W-30
oil, Amsoil Synthetic ATF.
'00 Ford Explorer XLT 5.0L V8 AWD Oxford White Clearcoat 34K Build date
11/19/1999
- Amsoil Series 2000 0W-30 oil, K&N Fuel Injection Performance Kit

SHO Club member http://www.shoclub.com/
Check out my web site http://www.paul-fisher.com/
Amsoil dealer http://www.paul-fisher.com/oil.htm

Get $5 free from Paypal! https://www.paypal.com/refer/pal=P3XEFFBFUFKN6

----- Original Message -----
From: <HomeboyNorm@aol.com>
To: <shotimes@autox.team.net>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 4:23 AM
Subject: [Shotimes] OT: Digital Camera ? - 3.1MP overkill for internet work?


> Hey folks,
>
> Would a 3.1 megapixtels camera be an overkill for some internet work such
as
> Ebay, homepages, etc?
>
> Should I stay with a 2.0MP digital camera such as Canon's Powershot A40
for
> my type of usage, or to go with a 3.1MP one of the likes to a Kodak
DX-4330?
>
> Also, does anyone out here know what the maximum length of a movie I can
> shoot with either model?
>
> Thanks, Norm the digital camera idiot (but learning fast)
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes