[Shotimes] Which MAF is best?

[Ian Fisher]

What constitutes "better drivability" though? Personally, I don't think
that the SHO suffers from any drivability issues that require the aid of
an LPM.

My car was running way rich with the LPM. Others have also theorized
that the rod bearing failures may be attributed to poor A/F tuning via
LPM. It's too iffy for such negligible gains/losses; I was not satisfied
with my LPM and I'm glad that I got rid of it. 

Ian
93 mtx getting better every day


-----Original Message-----
From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net
[mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Ron Childs
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 3:18 PM
To: shotimes@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [Shotimes] Which MAF is best?


I thought that there are changes to the fuel mixture as well at part 
throttle. Ted has always claimed better "drivability," not just HP gains

because of remapping fuel curves (I thought, but could be wrong.)

-Ron Childs



>From: "Dave Kegel" <d.kegel@attbi.com>
>
>The part throttle timing advance is iffy (often results in pinging) 
>there
>is
>arguably no reason to change the opening point of the secondaries, nor
do I
>think the idle speed needs to be bumped, even with UDPs.  That leaves
>turning on the cooling fan(s) a bit sooner than stock, big deal.
>
>Obviously if you have some wild cams or a blower, that's a different 
>story. As always, this is my opinion only, YMMV.


_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
_______________________________________________
Shotimes mailing list
Shotimes@autox.team.net http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes