[Shotimes] Which MAF is best?

[Mark Nunnally]

> Well then, here is the challenge I lay down to all SHO owners since it
seems
> I am the only one confident in the FORD 80mm and the LPM.  Show me a
> timeslip from a car with a 55mm or any ProFlow unit and no LPM with a much
> better 1/4 than a 14.5 and I will retract all I say about the LPM and 80mm
> MAF (on a full weight NA car of course).  I find it hard to believe that
my
> car is the ONLY one having success with an LPM and FORD 80mm.

I got a 12.9 timeslip on my old 89 with the 55mm MAF :o)

My 92 (fully loaded fat pig with 96 brakes and subframe connectors, strut
tower brace, etc)w/ 170k ran a couple 14.70s back in june, with less than
stellar 2.28 60's (SP8k's), and a slipping stock clutch.  I bet with a fresh
clutch and my nitto 225/50's I could run it to 14.50's.  Car has a ypipe,
UD's, and a Pro M 77mm that night (borrowed the 89's MAF when I ran it)

I agree with Ron though, the traps are gonna tell more of the hp story.
What were you traps on the 14.5 run(s) btw?  You have stage 1 cams right?

I wish I could have had 1 day with Dave Garber's old 95.  Would have liked
to put on UD's, a ypipe, catback,  Pro M77, and the 225/50 nitto's and seen
what that thing would have pulled!

mark