[Shotimes] Which MAF is best?
John Weidenbenner
johnjweid@earthlink.net
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 07:24:07 -0600
Don's same 94 ATX LPM program works very well on my 93 atx/D4U1 with the
Ford 80mm MAFS/Rubber plumber's elbow/S&B cone filter/Can/Horn.
Upper rpm torque feels stronger vs. 55 MAFS/box. Changing from the SHOshop
CAT back to stock CAT back improved low & mid-range torque, yet still
retained some of the upper rpm torque. As measured with my butt-dyno.
John W.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Don McKinnon (AST)"
> Those using the Ford 80MAF's are hit and miss with success in using them.
> Justin Schick's recent confirmation by Pro-Flow of a screwed up Ford 80MAF
> may point to at least one reason why Ford 80MAF & LPM are so finicky. I
> have had no problem with my Pep boys purchased "remanufactured" Ford
80MAF.
> I had the same success with the same Ford 80MAF and LPM (diff program of
> course) on my old 94 ATX, so I know they work.