[Shotimes] Which MAF is best?
Mark Nunnally
manunnal@netheaven.com
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 12:10:08 -0500
You can do a j-yard 3.2L cheaper than the 80mm/LPM, just takes a little
longer to bolt in :o)
Saw another dyno run from a 3.0L cam'd 3.2L. 220hp/215 torque, pretty much
what my 3.2L did as well. With full bolt-ons these are legit 265 hp motors
with the stock EEC program.
Will be interesting to see what (if any) gains are made once the EEC
refigures load based on a more accurate MAF curve (Pro M's numbers for my
unit) and changing displacement in the engine scalars (from 182 to 195 CI).
John H got some pretty impressive low end torque numbers with fuel trimming.
Within 2 ft/lbs of my stock program 3.2L.
mark