[Shotimes] Re: Fiero (was Cooling Issues???????)

[Ron Porter]

Weren't there two Turbo T/As out over time? One being the 301 motor back in
the '70s-early '80s sometime, and the other being the '89 with the 4.3 turbo
that was the same as the Syclone/Typhoon?

Ron Porter

-----Original Message-----
From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net
[mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of Donald Mallinson
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 4:46 PM
To: twright@one-eleven.net
Cc: shotimes@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [Shotimes] Re: Fiero (was Cooling Issues???????)


Tim,

When I said earlier POS I meant the earlier turbo Trans Am,
not the ones with only "motor".  I do agree, I would save
the Buick (with different heads on the Pontiac) motored
Turbo TA and also save the last year (2002?)

Don Mallinson

Timothy Wright wrote:

> Now we are going to have a fight, (j/k),
>
> If you have enough displacement you don't need a turbo. The two valve
covers
> were not evn in the same county.
>
> I know, I would not have to look far to find a big block hidden in your
> garage, and you would never trade that for a 301 CID turbo in your Tin
> Injun.
> I wish I had a clean original 455 SD.
>
> Tim
>
>
>
>
>>Back in 1989, at the Pontiac national convention, the top
>>Pontiac historian was asked which Pontiacs of modern vintage
>>(to that point of course) he would save for history/value/fun.
>>
>>He chose the Turbo Trans-Am, the one with the high HP Buick
>>turbo, not the earlier POS.
>>
>>
>>Don Mallinson
_______________________________________________
Shotimes mailing list
Shotimes@autox.team.net
http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes