[Shotimes] Re: Engine Break In (WAS: Interesting...porting the intake)

[John Weidenbenner]

I don't understand what those photos mean? A scientific report, not an
infomercial. Isn't he trying to sell a magazine?

John W.
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Ron Childs
  To: John Weidenbenner ; Chris Zap ; SHOtimes
  Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 11:30 AM
  Subject: Re: [Shotimes] Re: Engine Break In (WAS: Interesting...porting the
intake)


  They presented pictures of pistons/rings that were treated equally except
for the different break-in methods. What kind of proof would you be looking
for?

  -Ron Childs


  John Weidenbenner <johnjweid@earthlink.net> wrote:
    The motortune guy offers no proof of his theory. I consider it only an
    opioion without any scientific proof. The atricle is worthless.

    John W.

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Chris "Zap""


    > http://www.mototuneusa.com/break_in_secrets.htm
    >
    > Saw this a while ago.... very interesting article on break in for
engines
    of
    > all kinds!
    >
    > ~Chris
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: "John Weidenbenner"
    >
    > > What difference does that make? Looser bearings? More or less
    > > sealing/friction of the piston rings? "Bedding" in the engine block
    (like
    > > making the brakes work "better")?
    > >
    > > John W.
    > > ----- Original Message -----
    > > From: "Paul Nimz"
    > >
    > > > I think it is in how the motor is broke in.
    > > >
    > > > Paul Nimz
    > > _______________________________________________
    _______________________________________________
    Shotimes mailing list
    Shotimes@autox.team.net
    http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes