[Shotimes] Re:96 Brake Upgrade,was Annie goes solo too before becoming Cheating

[Dave Kegel]

It's a good thing you admitted to being drugged up because this makes no
sense. :)

It's illegal either way, who cares if it's illegal because it's from a '96
SHO or illegal because it's from a 95 Lincoln?

Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Chapin" <pchapin@houston.rr.com>
To: "SHOtimes" <shotimes@autox.team.net>
Sent: August 07, 2003 3:45 PM
Subject: [Shotimes] Re:96 Brake Upgrade,was Annie goes solo too before
becoming Cheating


> Not that it matters or that anyone cares let me explain how the 96 brake
> upgrade should be classified by those who desire to not break the rules.
You
> are not upgrading your brakes to 96 SHO brakes. You are switching your
> Taurus brakes to 1995 Lincoln Continental brakes. This is not an update or
> back date. It is not legal in stock or ESP. It may be legal in CP or EP.
The
> reason I take this position is that the 1995 Lincoln Continental is the
only
> vehicle that I am aware of that has every piece you need to do  this
> upgrade. You can not piecemeal parts from various cars and be a legal
update
> or back date.
>
> If I am wrong and there is a Taurus that you can get all the parts
necessary
> to do the upgrade please let me and everyone else know.
>
> Paul
> PS. Loaded on Hydrocodine from back surgery so if this sounds real harsh,
> sorry, just tired of reading and knowing I am too loaded to type, so have
a
> nice day:( :) ;)
> Not even going to try the 300hp topic, although it has been fun reading it
> through the drug/pain induced fog of the last six days. So blast away, I
am
> relatively numb at this point.
>
> > Well, the 96 brakes wouldnt be a backdate...
> >
> > Ian
> >
> > On Sun, 3 Aug 2003, Paul L Fisher wrote:
> >
> > > Nope. I got that from the head SCCA rules guy. Same with '96 brakes.
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes