[Shotimes] Re: Engine Break In (WAS: Interesting...porting
the intake)
John Weidenbenner
johnjweid@earthlink.net
Sat, 9 Aug 2003 10:03:56 -0500
It's in the message below.
I wonder why the auto manufactures do not recommend this simple secret to ring
sealing?
John W.
----- Original Message -----
From: John Weidenbenner
To: Ron Childs ; Chris Zap ; SHOtimes
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 6:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Shotimes] Re: Engine Break In (WAS: Interesting...porting the
intake)
I don't understand what those photos mean? A scientific report, not an
infomercial. Isn't he trying to sell a magazine?
John W.
----- Original Message -----
From: Ron Childs
To: John Weidenbenner ; Chris Zap ; SHOtimes
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Shotimes] Re: Engine Break In (WAS: Interesting...porting
the intake)
They presented pictures of pistons/rings that were treated equally except
for the different break-in methods. What kind of proof would you be looking
for?
-Ron Childs
John Weidenbenner <johnjweid@earthlink.net> wrote:
The motortune guy offers no proof of his theory. I consider it only an
opioion without any scientific proof. The atricle is worthless.
John W.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris "Zap""
> http://www.mototuneusa.com/break_in_secrets.htm
>
> Saw this a while ago.... very interesting article on break in for
engines
of
> all kinds!
>
> ~Chris
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Weidenbenner"
>
> > What difference does that make? Looser bearings? More or less
> > sealing/friction of the piston rings? "Bedding" in the engine block
(like
> > making the brakes work "better")?
> >
> > John W.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Paul Nimz"
> >
> > > I think it is in how the motor is broke in.
> > >
> > > Paul Nimz
> > _______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Shotimes mailing list
Shotimes@autox.team.net
http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes