[Shotimes] MAF connector question

[Justin Schick]

>From what I understand the benifit is as much in the 80 mm's ability to
more accurately sample the air as much as it is total CFM flow ability.


Justin Schick
silver 92 SHO in KC MO
194k and counting quickly

>>> "Jonathan Zane KC2ENA" <jonzane@kc2ena.com> 08/15/03 10:57AM >>>
Thanks for the info Carl,  I'll read up on that.  I'm still an SHO
noob.  I
wonder though, why an 80mm MAF for a 3.2L or 3.0L 6 cyl?  Guys run 9's
on
80mm MAFs on a 5.0L revving to 7,000 rpm.  Is it worth the hassle for
something that won't yield more performance then a 73mm or 77mm? 
What's the
most horse power someone is making with a SHO?  I just can't imagine a
need
for this application.

Jonathan Zane KC2ENA
1988 Mustang LX
1995 Taurus SHO
1993 Taurus SHO
1979 F-150 4x4
1989 Ford Festiva
2001 Raptor
www.njfourwheelers.com/jon.html 
www.kc2ena.com