[Shotimes] MAF connector question

[Jonathan Zane KC2ENA]

Which 73? There's got to be 10 companies making them.  The electronics are
the same in all of them, if you read my post you'll see I'm using the stock
sensor in many different housings.  I'm not sure what you mean by
resolution, the MAF itself is analog and the computer samples this at a set
rate, this is where "resolution" comes from.  It's like saying your 35mm
camera doesn't have enough pixels, lol  I'm not saying this Ted guy doesn't
know something we don't, but being in electronics and cars all of my life I
just haven't heard a compelling reason for a MAF this large yet.  I'll bet
my Cobra MAF would run the same time on one of these 260HP cars.  IMO You
guys are wasting your money.

Jon


> -----Original Message-----
> From: van Oss [mailto:vanOss@centurytel.net] 
> 
> Ted Breaux, the grandpappy of all SHO chip programmers, has 
> said repeatedly that the 73mm MAF gives the computer poorer 
> data (lower resolution, IIRC) than the 80mm unit.  It's not 
> the diameter of the housing so much as the ability of the 
> electronics to provide an accurate airflow curve.
> 
> Joseph

--
This message was sent with an unlicensed evaluation version of
Novell NetMail. Please see http://www.netmail.com/ for details.