[Shotimes] Taurus perceptions & required readings

[Ron Nottingham]

Did you like that little "review"?  If so, I am the author :-)  If not, I'm
still the author :-)

Yes, I really DID write that prose.  I am the site owner of
http://www.v6sho.com/ (the external source mentioned in the review :-)

Ron N. - Dalton, GA
90 SHO
"It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile"

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin M. Bisch" <kevin624@bellatlantic.net>
To: <shotimes@autox.team.net>
Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2003 12:20 AM
Subject: [Shotimes] Taurus perceptions & required readings


> Came across this:
>
> http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Taurus
>
> Interesting to see how people perceive the Taurus, and in particular, the
SHO.
>
> If that blip interests you, I'd strongly recommend reading the three books
> available that focus on the Taurus. "Reinventing the Wheels", "Taurus: The
> Car that Saved Ford" and "Car" are their titles. The second one named,
IMO,
> was the best read of the three. The last one was solely about the '96
> redesign... interesting notes in that book too though, like the designers
> knew you couldn't use the cupholders and the ashtray in the '96
6-passenger
> model at the same time, but built it that way anyway.
>
> On another note, looking at the four generation of Taurii, which do you
> think had the best build-quality? I've owned four Taurii now and my '97
has
> the best fit & finish of all the years out there (barring the SHO cam
> failures). I even think the 1997 model year was marginally better than '98
> and '99. There was significant de-contenting in '99, and little stuff like
> the turn signals sounding better in the '97's. The aesthetics are best
> saved for another discussion.
>
> --Kevin
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes