[Shotimes] 77mm Pro-M MAF quality

[Ron Porter]

Bolt it on, reset the PCM.

Does the car run better? That's the only criteria.

Polished/smooth parts are not the best for airflow.

When you buy a fast-food burger meal, do you expect it to look like the
picture in the store??

Ron Porter 

-----Original Message-----
From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]
On Behalf Of Michael
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 1:24 PM
To: shotimes@autox.team.net
Subject: [Shotimes] 77mm Pro-M MAF quality


Hi,

I just got a 77mm Pro-M MAF and, even though I have not installed it yet,
I'm quite disappointed wrt to assembly quality and the appearance of the
meter. It's almost like some 10 year old did the machine work on the meter.


For example about 10% of the venturi opening is polished while the rest is
rough.  And the sample tube is a joke.  On Pro-M's web site, they make a big
deal out of the sample tube opening also having a venturi shape. Woopeee,
lucky me. Pro-M must have learned that a straight uniformly shaped cylinder
all the way from the sensor element to the opening is a better approach,
cause that's what my meter has.  Maybe Venturi in the sample tube doesn't
make a darn difference.  That is a possibility. But then don't hype it up so
much on the web site.  Shit like that just makes my upset.

How do your Pro-M meters look?

According to Pro-M all the meters they have in stock look as I described it
above.  I'm not sure I believe them.  "Try it out. If it doesn't perform
well, return it.", they told me.  So I have not done that yet.  In the mean
time I'm just curious what other 77mm Pro-M meters look like.


Michael
94MTX,green,BOS+

_______________________________________________
Express Yourself - Share Your Mood in Emails!
Visit www.SmileyCentral.com - the happiest place on the Web.
_______________________________________________
Shotimes mailing list
Shotimes@autox.team.net
http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes