[Shotimes] 16x7 or 16x7.5 ?

[Bruce Malachuk]

ok let me rephrase

If someone dies in my family and leaves me money, then I'll blow a little
bit on something frivolous like rims. then the rest would be put away.
Actually, if it were enough I have a weak moment and get one of those boost
inducing modifications.

Not that I want anyone in my family to die, but I've lost 2 this year, and
bad things happen in 3s.

Bruce

----- Original Message -----
From: <ianf@eden.rutgers.edu>
To: <bmalach1@nycap.rr.com>; <ronporter@prodigy.net>;
<gr8sho@prochilo.myserver.org>; <shotimes@autox.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 4:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Shotimes] 16x7 or 16x7.5 ?


> How does that work? If someone dies a free set of rims shows up at your
> door?
>
> Any unsolved murders up your way there Bruce? :)
>
> Ian
>
>
> > ADR makes a wheel called the RS Limited MASE, i think its a 5spoke,
> and it
> > weighs in at ~17.5lbs, but it only comes in a 17X7in I might end up
> with a
> > pair of them next spring. Less someone dies or I win some money.
> >
> > Bruce
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ron Porter" <ronporter@prodigy.net>
> > To: "'Carl Prochilo'" <gr8sho@prochilo.myserver.org>;
> > <shotimes@autox.team.net>
> > Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 12:24 PM
> > Subject: RE: [Shotimes] 16x7 or 16x7.5 ?
> >
> >
> > > If you are looking at 16" wheels, Gary Morrell wrote about his ROH
> Snyper
> > > 16x8 wheels awhile back. Here's a link to a company with them.
> Looks like
> > > the 16x8 are $168, and Gary mentioned that they weigh about 17 #s:
> > >
> > > http://www.groupawheels.com/prod01.htm
> > >
> > > For a 17" wheel, Konig Toxxins are used by a few folks, also, and
> the
> > > 17x7.75 weighs in at 17.28 #s:
> > >
> > >
> > http://www.konigwheels.com/catalog_product_details.cfm?
> CategoryID=1&ss_id=25
> > > 6
> > >
> > > Tire Rack used to carry these, they may still.
> > >
> > > Ron Porter
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Carl Prochilo [mailto:gr8sho@prochilo.myserver.org]
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 12:02 PM
> > > To: Ron Porter; shotimes@autox.team.net
> > > Subject: Re: [Shotimes] 16x7 or 16x7.5 ?
> > >
> > >
> > > Interesting.  That parameter never came up in the discussion.  This
> one
> > > falls under the category "if it looks too good to be true, then it
> > probably
> > > isn't".  Sorry to hear Vlad had to find that out the hard way.
> BTW, most
> > > TireRack wheels look to be in the 20 lb range.  I had the guy do a
> scan of
> > > all the SHO choices in 16" size and I think the lightest one was 19
> lbs.
> > >
> > > Carl
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Ron Porter" <ronporter@prodigy.net>
> > > To: "'Carl Prochilo'" <gr8sho@prochilo.myserver.org>;
> > > <shotimes@autox.team.net>
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 11:20 AM
> > > Subject: RE: [Shotimes] 16x7 or 16x7.5 ?
> > >
> > >
> > > Yes.....look, but don't touch!!
> > >
> > > More specifically, look at the 1,200#/wheel load rating......not
> enough
> > for
> > > the SHO.
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Shotimes mailing list
> > > Shotimes@autox.team.net
> > > http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
> > _______________________________________________
> > Shotimes mailing list
> > Shotimes@autox.team.net
> > http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes