[Shotimes] Gen 3 SHO's, I have to admit this...

[Paul Nimz]

SARC struts are great as long as they are disabled.  (I left the VAPS as is)

Paul Nimz
'97 TR
'93 EG mtx



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dave Garber" <DGARBER@servicelinklp.com>
To: "Christian Andretta" <passport@optonline.net>; "Paul Nimz"
<niks@dlogue.net>; "Don McKinnon (AST)" <dmckinnon@asttechlabs.com>;
<shotimes@autox.team.net>
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2003 1:33 PM
Subject: RE: [Shotimes] Gen 3 SHO's, I have to admit this...


> I've had a 97 and now a 99 and I personally like the 99 the best. There
> are little changes to the interior that I like, the removal of the SARC
> struts is a plus to me and I prefer the 99 wheels over the previous
> years.
>
> For the most part, they're all pretty much the same on the major things.
> The 98-99 interiors with the 'mocha' are much nicer than the 96-97
> 'saddle'. Plus, the 99's are faster!!  :p
>
>
>
> Dave Garber
> Pittsburgh, PA
> 99 White
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christian Andretta [mailto:passport@optonline.net]
> Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 2:06 AM
> To: Paul Nimz; Don McKinnon (AST); shotimes@autox.team.net
>
> Some may argure that the 99 susp. is better, some say worse.   The 99
> susp.
> system is not SARC equipped,  the shocks are valved differently that the
> SLO's though.  I say that the 99 will be the easiest to modufy susp.
> wise and not have to play with wires and sensors.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net
> [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of Paul Nimz
> Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 2:00 AM
> To: Don McKinnon (AST); shotimes@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: [Shotimes] Gen 3 SHO's, I have to admit this...
>
>
> If you get the tranny rebuilt be sure to get the torque converter done
> too.
> '96-97s are the best IMHO.  '98s have speedo problems and the '99 is a
> stripped version.  Though it nay be the lightest, even though it is
> lacking in the suspension department.
>
> Paul Nimz
> '97 TR
> '93 EG mtx