[Shotimes] Now Amish was:"My Bologna"
bobsteig@att.net
bobsteig@att.net
Sat, 28 Jun 2003 19:08:53 +0000
Dimensional indeed. Our 1890's built 'Row House' here in town has REAL
dimensions. The main support beams are 12"x12", rough hewn right out of tree
trunks. The joists are 4"x12", and the studs are real 2"x4"'s. Whenever I do
any structural work I need to make up those pesky 1/4" differences. A real
P.I.T.A. at times. I wish I'd known about the 'Amish' wood a couple of years
ago, woulda saved me some grief.
BTW, did someone say something about not being able to get good wood???
How old ARE you guys? ;-)
Cheers, BB-NYC '89
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 09:45:09 -0500
From: Donald Mallinson <dmall@mwonline.net>
To: George Fourchy <krazgeo@jps.net>
CC: "shotimes@autox.team.net" <shotimes@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: (OT) Wood...was: Re: [Shotimes] Now Amish was:"My Bologna"
Didn't pay attention to the previous notes, but the term for
lumber that is less than the actual measurements is
"Dimensional"
Really!
Don Mallinson
George Fourchy wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 03:06:29 +0000, bobsteig@att.net wrote:
>
>
>>Good grief, the best I can do in NYC is 1 3/4" x 3 1/2".
>
>
> Studs are ''surfaced-4 sides'' before they are sold. They are rough-cut to an
> actual 2 x 4 inches, but when they are smoothed, about 1/4 of an inch per
side is
> removed. I guess too many carpenters complained of splinters in the past.
The San
> Leandro, Calif. house I sold last summer was built in 1937, and when we redid
the
> kitchen, taking it down to studs and joists for new walls and floors, the
studs were
> rough-cut nominal (means "actually") 2 x 4 inches, and they were all clear
> redwood....looked like they had been assembled last week. Beautiful.
>
> No more....our new house has pretty knotty studs, and the framer went out of
his way
> to use the best he could get (without getting into trouble) for us....you
just
can't
> get as much good wood at one time anymore.
>
> George