[Shotimes] Insurance (again, sorry)

[Al Fitz]

That's not unusual. The insurance companies know that the slightest damage
to your SHO in an accident will result in a total loss. New OEM replacement
parts are not available anymore for repairs. In case of an accident, they
may convince you accept used parts, but if you insist on new, they have a
total loss claim to pay.


Al Fitz
alfitz@alfitz.com
SHO Parts at
http://www.alfitz.com/sho
*************************************************************************
PLEASE INCLUDE A COPY OF THIS EMAIL IN YOUR REPLY
*************************************************************************

----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Fanning" <Awfanning@earthlink.net>
To: "SHOtimes" <shotimes@autox.team.net>
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 5:24 AM
Subject: [Shotimes] Insurance (again, sorry)


> In my most recent insurance bill, insurance for my '91 SHO has jumped 39%
> while coverage on my wife's '98 Accord dropped 17%. The net result is the
> Honda is now $51 cheaper to insure per 6 month period than the SHO.
Anybody
> else seeing similar trends on their SHO insurance rates?
>
> The other curiosity is that liability on the fully insured '91 is $181,
> whereas on the '90 SHO that I have (which has neither comp or collision)
the
> liability is $70 for the same 50/100/300 coverage. Isn't liability
> independent of the car's value and more a function of the likely damage
> you'll do to somebody else? Weird.
>
>     Alan
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes