[Shotimes] OT - 2006 Mercury Milan

[John J. Weidenbenner]

My 93 atx sat on the dealers lot for 10 1/2 months. It was heavily
discounted and he was glad to unload it.

John W.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ron Porter" <ronporter@prodigy.net>
To: <shotimes@autox.team.net>
Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 11:08 AM
Subject: RE: [Shotimes] OT - 2006 Mercury Milan


> We are talking apples and atom bombs here. What the motoring press &
> enthusiasts think about a car has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with it's
> performance on the showroom floor. If largely decreasing sales that only
met
> projections ONE year (for the projected 20K/year....and it was in '93 when
> the ATX came out) doesn't qualify as a sales failure, I don't know what
the
> hell does!! From SHOtimes:
>
> Model Year 5-speeds Automatics Total
> 1989 15,561 &nbsp; 15,561
> 1990 8,609 &nbsp; 8,609
> 1991 9,136 &nbsp; 9,136
> 1992 8,000 &nbsp; 8,000
> 1993 *4,095 *18,337 21,991
> 1994 *2,497 *11,201 13,698
> 1995 *2,036 *7,980 10,016
>  Right Hand Left Hand
> 1996 91 4,942 5,033
> 1997 1 (one)  10,132 10,133
> 1998   **2,317
> 1999   no data
>
> It's not my "desire to never sound like a cheerleader", it's to fight the
> nausea from the blind cheerleading for this car and I don't find on any of
> the car lists that I've subscribed to over the years. Get real. To love
the
> car for what it is is fine, to attempt to rewrite history to act like the
> SHO was the Second Coming is way over the top, and not justified.
>
> My description of what dealers and sales people think of the SHO is
reality.
> There are obviously people here who take it as a slam on all that the car
> is.  No, it was more than "a few '89s left over", there were SHOs left
over
> almost to the next ('91) model year, and this was the case for '89, '95,
and
> '99s....plus obviously my '94 that sat on the lot for 15 months. I will
> spare the other years of SHOs, as I wasn't looking at leftover sales in
> those years when I wasn't interested in buying.
>
> Don, I guess my 15 years of SHO ownership (and having at least one of each
> Gen) doesn't entitle me to have "maybe" seen a few things with these cars,
> and you obviously don't see me as a "TRUE SHO BELIEVER" since I might dare
> to disparage certain aspects pertaining to these cars.
>
> Ron Porter
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]
> On Behalf Of Donald Mallinson
> Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2004 10:12 PM
> Cc: shotimes@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: [Shotimes] OT - 2006 Mercury Milan
>
>
> The SHO numbers were better than the new GTO, and no, sales
> didn't nosedive, sales of near 10,000 aren't horrible, even
> is below predictions.
>
> I am not letting anything blind me, I just don't feel like
> the car was a sales failure.
>
> Sure there were 89's left over.  With ultra rare exceptions
> there are ALWAYS cars left over well into the next year.
>
> I think you are letting your desire to never sound like a
> cheerleader, cause you to unfairly put down a car that was
> seriously applauded by all the motoring press for more than
> the 15 minutes of fame you assign to it.
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes