[Shotimes] Was the SHO MO?

Carl Prochilo gr8sho@adelphia.net
Mon, 30 Aug 2004 08:55:31 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)


Here you go.  This is the sticker from my car, which is still a daily driver.

http://prochilo.myserver.org:2080/images/sho_sticker.jpg

The right answer for a 92 SHO was $24K, which was a significant increase
from the gen 1 IIRC.  Throw in all the options and you're up to $27K. 
What's not listed on the sticker that could have been there is the console
CD player that listed for $500.  I spent $600 for a trunk mounted changer
from the dealer with a Ford badge on it but really a SONY.

I seem to recall regular Taurus was around 17K - 18K.
-- 
Cheers,
Carl Prochilo
92 Ultra Red Crimson

On Mon, August 30, 2004 7:33 am, Paul L Fisher said:
> I belive they were always right around $29,000. My '86 Taurus LX listed at
> $18,000.
>
> Paul L Fisher
>
> 1999 Ford Taurus SHO TR 69K - Kirk'ed 2/29/04.
>
> - Amsoil Series 2000 0W-30
> - Amsoil TS-124 Oiled Foam Filter
>
> Visit my Website http://www.paul-fisher.com
> SHOClub member http://www.SHOClub.com
> Amsoil Dealer: http://www.paul-fisher.com/oil
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]
> On Behalf Of Bobbonnit1@aol.com
> Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 2:38 AM
> To: SHOTIMES@autox.team.net
> Subject: [Shotimes] Was the SHO MO?
>
> Just how much did a new SHO cost compared to regular  taurus's.?
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes