[Shotimes] Was the SHO MO?

[Ron Porter]

Your '89 is semi-loaded. The leather, 2-6-ways, power antenna and JBL were
optional. Sounds about right (with a sticker about $1K over my '89).

FWIW, I had the choice of another black one, identical except it had the
EATC, which was about a $185 option. Glad I didn't get THAT option, I never
had to replace a blend door with the standard 3-knob setup!

Ron Porter

-----Original Message-----
From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]
On Behalf Of bobsteig@att.net
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 10:53 PM
To: SHOTIMES@autox.team.net
Subject: [Shotimes] Was the SHO MO?


I don't know about that, my '89 has full leather, 2 6 ways, power antenna,
A/C, JBL's but, no moonroof, no keyless (PITA, wish it did), no c/d and no
electronic etac. 
As 2nd owner, I don't have the original sticker, but I remember having seen
some 
documentation about it being 23 and change. 

Best, Bob (BB-NYC '89)


Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 12:56:10 -0400

Maybe mine was the 211, then with the "basic" options that were standard on
all SHOs.

Mine had nothing beyond that basic option group (No: keyless, EATC, power
antenna, leather, moonroof, power pass. seat, etc).

Ron Porter

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Mucher [mailto:mmucher@bellsouth.net] 
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 12:29 PM
To: 'Ron Porter'; SHOTIMES@autox.team.net
Subject: RE: [Shotimes] Was the SHO MO?



In '90 ('89 too) the 212 was basically ALL the options - leather, auto air,
moonroof, power pass seat, JBL, keyless, etc etc etc - don't have it in
front of me now...

Mark
_______________________________________________
Shotimes mailing list
Shotimes@autox.team.net
http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes