[Shotimes] 93 SHO Vs. Sable rear rotors

[Mike Murphy]

just an FYI I found out when I put on some Konis a lifetime ago...

the 92 model midway through production switched to the non-vented.

Murph


From: "SVTSHO (Bill Byrer)" <svtsho@worldnet.att.net>
To: "Robert M." <mysho93@yahoo.com>, <shotimes@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [Shotimes] 93 SHO Vs. Sable rear rotors
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:05:10 -0500

93 and later have non-vented rear rotors stock. 89-92 have vented rear
rotors. Probably a 92 Sable.

Bill
92 soon to be for sale
95
99
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert M." <mysho93@yahoo.com>
To: <shotimes@autox.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 8:55 AM
Subject: [Shotimes] 93 SHO Vs. Sable rear rotors


 > What's up, guys? I was at a salvage yard the other day and there was a
Sable with the rear wheels off, and it had the vented rear rotors. When I
got home, I looked at my 93 SHO, and it has the solid rear rotors. Does
anyone know what, if any, differences are, better maybe? I was unsure of the
year model Sable, but I was curious if there was any improvement over my 93
SHO parts. Thanks for any info.
 >
 >
 > -Robert Miller
 >
 > -93 Black on Black MTX SHO, 130k, NEEDS A CRANK OR NEW ENGINE!
 > -90 Red on Black 5.0 Mustang LX, Hatchback
 > -81 Doodoo Brown Fairmont Wagon, (SOLD Finally!!! $170!!)
 >
 > ---------------------------------
 > Do you Yahoo!?
 > Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online
 > _______________________________________________
 > Shotimes mailing list
 > Shotimes@autox.team.net
 > http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
_______________________________________________
Shotimes mailing list
Shotimes@autox.team.net
http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes

_________________________________________________________________
Click here for a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee. 
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963