[Shotimes] SHO TRIVIA WINNER ANNOUNCED

[David Niemiec]

I caught it. It was illicit, instead of the proper "elicit."

Schmarty Pants.

Dave
1993 ATX for sale

Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 19:56:19 -0500
From: "James F. Ryan III" <av8r567@optonline.net>
Subject: Re: [Shotimes] SHO TRIVIA WINNER ANNOUNCED
To: Mark Mucher <mmucher@bellsouth.net>
Cc: "'_ShoTimes'" <Shotimes@autox.team.net>

D'oh!!!!

That was a typo (and so was critcally), Outlook Express doesn't have
spell-check.

The incorrect word is a deliberate use of a wrong word.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Mucher" <mmucher@bellsouth.net>
To: "'James F. Ryan III'" <av8r567@optonline.net>
Cc: "'_ShoTimes'" <Shotimes@autox.team.net>
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 7:40 PM
Subject: RE: [Shotimes] SHO TRIVIA WINNER ANNOUNCED


>staus?
>
>Mark
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]
>On Behalf Of James F. Ryan III
>Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 7:17 PM
>To: Al Fitz
>Cc: _ShoTimes
>Subject: Re: [Shotimes] SHO TRIVIA WINNER ANNOUNCED
>
>But "integral" has absolutely nothing to do with "street legal".
>
>I'm not trying to start an argument, just saying that integral was a poor
>choice.  It automatically elevates the staus of the item to 'critcally
>important' and/or 'absolutely necessary'.
>
>Your use of the word "integral" automatically illicited responses of
>critically important items like sub-frame, unibody, etc.  Perhaps,
plain-old
>"important" would have sufficed for the clock spring.
>
>Otherwise, it was a great contest and I sure appreciate you supplying the
>emblems for free.
>
>
>$1.00 to the person who can find the incorrect word in this e-mail.

_________________________________________________________________
Watch high-quality video with fast playback at MSN Video. Free! 
http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200365ave/direct/01/