[Shotimes] Pontiac unveils SHO successor?

[Shylo McKinsey]

"A properly set-up RWD car will work far better than a
FWD car."

True. My dad's '69 Mach 1 with stud tires on all 4
corners holds the roads much better then my SHO
anyday. But with the all seasons he has on it right
now, I'd really like to see him keep up with me. I
highly doubt he will, but maybe I'm wrong.

Like you said, a RWD properly set up will drive better
in the snow, but, how many "clueless" people out there
will spend time/money (which, I admit, isn't all that
much) to equip their RWD cars with the proper "stuff"?
Not too many. Even in a place like MT, most people
here don't even bother, they just drive/slide to their
destinations. So, for where I'm from and what I grew
up dealing with, FWD is better.

Shylo McKinsey

'91 White MTX

--- Ron Porter <ronporter@prodigy.net> wrote:

> No, that's the point many of us are making.....FWD
> is NOT better than RWD in
> the snow. BTDT. A properly set-up RWD car will work
> far better than a FWD
> car.
> 
> FWD cars are good in the snow for the bulk of
> clueless drivers who have
> never learned proper car handling in ANY kind of
> conditions.
> 
> Ron Porter
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net
> [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]
> On Behalf Of Shylo McKinsey
> Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 12:38 AM
> To: Jason Hartberger
> Cc: TaurusSHO
> Subject: Re: [Shotimes] Pontiac unveils SHO
> successor?
> 
> 
> 
> And for the rest of you SHO folks, I've watched this
> thread go on for at least WEEK. AND NONE of you have
> made ANY sense the last 3 days. Guess what, just
> call
> it good and leave it, cuz this thread is DEAD. FWD
> is
> better in the snow then RWD. We all know this. 
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. 
www.yahoo.com