[Shotimes] Emissions question

[Mike]

You're right; all ATX's have EGR, this one is not a CA model.  Still it has
lower emissions than my '90 EGR ever did, no matter what I did.
Mike


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Leigh Smith" <leighsm@comcast.net>
To: "Mike" <srfdude@cox.net>; "SHO Times" <shotimes@autox.team.net>
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 5:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Shotimes] Emissions question


> Apples & Oranges though.
> I'm assuming you got a Califonia model w/ EGR right?
> Or did all ATX have EGR?
> Mines a 49 state MTX, no EGR.
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Mike" <srfdude@cox.net>
> To: "SHO Times" <shotimes@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 5:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [Shotimes] Emissions question
>
>
> > Hah, check this out. My '95 ATX, 59K miles, bone stock, OEM all the way,
> > plugs wires, etc.
> > NOx 5 (thats right)ppm,  CO .02%,  HC 7 ppm.  Chassis dyno, smog-only
> check
> > station.  California requires a check at a smog only station for the
gross
> > polluters ;-)
> > Mike
> >
> > > I'd assume misfire & lean. %CO goes to zero, NOX skyrockets. Curve? is
> > > almost straight up. Too much heat.
> > > FYI, my all-new 1200 mile SHO engine just passed at 662 ppm NOX, 11
ppm
> > HC,
> > > and 0.10 %CO on NJ state chassis dyno.
> > > :-)
> > > Lee
> > > 94 MTX
> > _______________________________________________
> > Shotimes mailing list
> > Shotimes@autox.team.net
> > http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes