[Shotimes] Re: Convention 2004 DVD

[Ian Fisher]

My 94 ATX and my current 93 MTX have non power
passenger seats. My 93 atx parts car had power.

Many SHO's do not have power passenger seats.
Considering how much the motors weigh, that's not a
bad thing either.

Ian

--- Rick Glass <rick@pitroadproducts.com> wrote:

> I have owned 5 SHO's.....All had dual power seats.
> '93 MTX
> '94 ATX
> '96 ES....cam failure
> '96 ES
> '99 SF
> 
> Charlie has owned 7 SHO's.....All had dual power
> seats.
> '92 Silver
> '95 MTX
> '95 MTX
> '94 MTX....parts car
> '96 ES
> '97 SF
> '99 White
> 
> Must just be a HUGE coincidence
> 
> Rick Glass
>    Nashville, TN
>    SESHOC 
> '99 Silver 59k (still adding up) 
>    Flowmaster 40's
>    no "pre-muff"/resonator
>    Kirk'd #432 (8-31-04)
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Shylo McKinsey" <mrfluffy02@yahoo.com>
> To: "TaurusSHO" <shotimes@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 10:42 PM
> Subject: RE: [Shotimes] Re: Convention 2004 DVD
> 
> 
> > Really? Huh, color me stupid then. I could've
> sworn I
> > saw on the SHOtimes website that the dual power
> seats
> > were standard. Guess I'll go back (sheepishly) and
> > look, but...not like it would matter. My bad...
> > 
> > Shylo McKinsey
> > 
> > --- Ron Porter <ronporter@prodigy.net> wrote:
> > 
> > > Maybe your SHO has the optional power passenger
> > > seat, but it was not
> > > standard.
> > > 
> > > Ron Porter
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net
> > > [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]
> > > On Behalf Of Shylo McKinsey
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 11:33 PM
> > > To: TaurusSHO
> > > Subject: Re: [Shotimes] Re: Convention 2004 DVD
> > > 
> > > 
> > > The one thing I've really noticed in the SHO,
> and
> > > I've
> > > rarely seen in ANY other car, (well American and
> > > Japanese cars...the majority of whats in MT and
> > > where
> > > I was in school in NC) is the side bolsters on
> the
> > > seats, and the fact that the SHO had dual power
> > > seats
> > > up front.
> > > 
> > > Shylo McKinsey
> > > 
> > > '91 White MTX
> > > 
> > > --- Donald Mallinson <dmall@mwonline.net> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > FYI, the SHO, even in it's most basic form in
> 1989
> > > > was 
> > > > considered a high content car.  Many of the
> > > features
> > > > it had 
> > > > still aren't standard in even some very high
> > > content
> > > > cars.
> > > > 
> > > > No it isn't the be all and end all, but it
> never
> > > was
> > > > a 
> > > > "basic" automobile
> > > > 
> > > > Don Mallinson
> > > > 
> > > > bjshov8 wrote:
> > > > > The SHO started as a fairly basic
> automobile,
> > > > compared to new cars of today.
> > > > > It is natural for things to evolve, content
> to
> > > > increase, expectations to get
> > > > > higher.  The Altima is probably closer
> > > > content-wise to the original SHO, but
> > > > > these days I would be looking at the Max
> instead
> > > > of the Altima.  Of course I
> > > > > would probably be looking at the G35
> instead.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > >>Hard to compare them now, but content-wise,
> the
> > > > Altima seems to be closer.
> > > > >>Maxima is more content, unlike the Maxima of
> > > old,
> > > > which was a more direct
> > > > >>SHO competitor on many fronts. Toss-up on
> either
> > > > one, though.
> > > > > 
> > > > >
> _______________________________________________
> > > > > Shotimes mailing list
> > > > > Shotimes@autox.team.net
> > > > >
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
> > > >
> _______________________________________________
> > > > Shotimes mailing list
> > > > Shotimes@autox.team.net
> > > > http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > Declare Yourself - Register online to vote
> today!
> > > http://vote.yahoo.com
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Shotimes mailing list
> > > Shotimes@autox.team.net
> > > http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
> > http://vote.yahoo.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Shotimes mailing list
> > Shotimes@autox.team.net
> > http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com