[Shotimes] Re: 93 SHO Failed Texas State Inspection
Ron Porter
ronporter@prodigy.net
Sun, 10 Apr 2005 17:43:21 -0400
On the "tailpipe sniffing" tests in IL & KY with my '89, it always passed
very easily. The last couple of years ('97 & '98) were with over 150K miles,
and a BOS with an LPM.
Ron Porter
-----Original Message-----
From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]
On Behalf Of Alan Fanning
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 5:32 PM
To: SHOtimes
Subject: [Shotimes] Re: 93 SHO Failed Texas State Inspection
Overall experience in the BaySHO club with current California dyno-based
smog tests is that the non-EGR cars have a harder time passing NOx testing
vs thpse that have EGR. Some have required pulling the SPOUT connector in
order to pass.
Personally, I (and others) have found that a non-functioning EGR system
(e.g., plugged EGR passages in the intake) is likely to result in failing
the test, which I take as an indication that non-EGR cars would also have
trouble given the purpose of EGR being to reduce NOx emissions.
Alan
Ron Porter wrote:
>
> But, all 49-state MTXs never had EGR valves, and passed emissions just
fine.
>
> Ron Porter
>
> Alan Fanning <Awfanning@earthlink.net> wrote:
> For cars that have it, the EGR system is a common source of problems in
> failing NOx limits due to plugging of the passageways in the intake
> manifold. In general, high NOx is caused by high combustion temperatures
> (which are moderated by a properly functioning EFR system).
>
> Alan
_______________________________________________
Shotimes mailing list
Shotimes@autox.team.net
http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes