[Shotimes] Re: GMS sues Pro-M and shuts them down

Mark Nunnally Mark Nunnally" <marknunnally@JoiMail.com
Sat, 30 Apr 2005 12:11:00 -0400


> Whatever the case may be, I didn't care for
> Granatelli's attitude on the forum. I also thought
> that some of his claims were outrageous such as "Pro-M
> used junkyard cores for their MAF's". I am satisified
> with my Pro-M (I'll find out more when I begin using
> my TwEECer) so I feel that perhaps I was lucky.

The beauty of them (IMHO) is that their stock curve 850 kg/hr units (like my
77mm) have a dead on factory curve, and match dead on for the stock EEC MAF
transfer.  This means with the Tweecer, you never have to really touch it
anyway.  Only reason you'd need to do that, is if you jump to a different
transfer function (like one of the 1100 kg/hr Ford units, etc) for a really
high hp motor.

So it works well with a stock motor (7 whp on the dyno on a typical
stock/BOS car) and works well if you like to do some spark/fuel tuning as
well (ie, just leave the MAF alone).  I like simple

mark