[Shotimes] '92 grey leather vs '95 grey leather
Mark Pawlowski
markski@molalla.net
Mon, 1 Aug 2005 14:53:14 -0700
And the GEN I seats feel more comfortable (softer leather, better foam rubber)
than my 95 seats.
95 Leather seats had cloth on the section that faces the center console.
IMHO a much better idea cause it cuts down on leather squeaks against the
console. For all other intents and purposes the 92 backs are the same as 95
backs, I thought just 89 was the one year that was the one with the
different bolsters.
Granted gen1's did all come with perferated leather, I think.
Bruce J Malachuk
* 94 Opal Frost MTX
* 93 Emerald Green MTX - SOLD
* 93 Black ATX - New Parts CAR
* 95 Silver Frost ATX SE - SLO -Buyer waiting
* 96 TR - Cam Failed parts car :-(
-----Original Message-----
From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]
On Behalf Of Alan Fanning
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 2:34 PM
To: SHOtimes
Subject: [Shotimes] '92 grey leather vs '95 grey leather
A buddy who lives an hour away has offered up the excellent condition
passenger seat from his '92 if I'll help him install some replacement seats
in his car. I'm thinking this would be a good way to upgrade the driver
seat
back in my '95. However, given the difference in years I wonder if the
seats
are the same (did the '92's use the Gen I seats?) and whether the leather
will match? They're both grey leather.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Alan
_______________________________________________
Shotimes mailing list
Shotimes@autox.team.net
http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
_______________________________________________
Shotimes mailing list
Shotimes@autox.team.net
http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes