[Shotimes] Re: For sale, Pritesh Deb's 3.6L

Ron Porter ronporter@prodigy.net
Sun, 7 Aug 2005 13:26:20 -0400


Yes, I find the mph Dynojet #s to be hard to read and interpret.....

But, there is an issue with ATX cars. Unless you have a custom chip to lock
it in a gear, and lock the TC, dyno #s are hard to read on an rpm scale.

This was the issue with Gen 3 dyno charts years back. It was near impossible
to get good torque/HP numbers below about 4K with the tranny shifting.

Ron Porter

-----Original Message-----
From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]
On Behalf Of Alan Fanning
Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2005 1:05 PM
To: SHOtimes
Subject: [Shotimes] Re: For sale, Pritesh Deb's 3.6L

1.  Wouldn't the x-axis more commonly be rpm rather than mph? Seems a little
useless to use mph.

2.  $50k on a Taurus?  OMG!

3.  He should know better than to claim 260hp is real.

4.  I recall seing this car at last year's convention. Quite unremarkable
IMO.

    Alan


> 
> Interesting car, but no way did it dyno 260 at the wheels.  That is one
> funky looking dyno chart.  Those look like torque converter blips to me.
> Paul Nimz is familiar with ATX dyno graphs, maybe he will comment.
> 
> Dave
_______________________________________________
Shotimes mailing list
Shotimes@autox.team.net
http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes