[Shotimes] Re: For sale, Pritesh Deb's 3.6L
Ron Porter
ronporter@prodigy.net
Sun, 7 Aug 2005 13:26:20 -0400
Yes, I find the mph Dynojet #s to be hard to read and interpret.....
But, there is an issue with ATX cars. Unless you have a custom chip to lock
it in a gear, and lock the TC, dyno #s are hard to read on an rpm scale.
This was the issue with Gen 3 dyno charts years back. It was near impossible
to get good torque/HP numbers below about 4K with the tranny shifting.
Ron Porter
-----Original Message-----
From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]
On Behalf Of Alan Fanning
Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2005 1:05 PM
To: SHOtimes
Subject: [Shotimes] Re: For sale, Pritesh Deb's 3.6L
1. Wouldn't the x-axis more commonly be rpm rather than mph? Seems a little
useless to use mph.
2. $50k on a Taurus? OMG!
3. He should know better than to claim 260hp is real.
4. I recall seing this car at last year's convention. Quite unremarkable
IMO.
Alan
>
> Interesting car, but no way did it dyno 260 at the wheels. That is one
> funky looking dyno chart. Those look like torque converter blips to me.
> Paul Nimz is familiar with ATX dyno graphs, maybe he will comment.
>
> Dave
_______________________________________________
Shotimes mailing list
Shotimes@autox.team.net
http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes