[Shotimes] update on my '93
Justin Schick
jschick@aafp.org
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:40:46 -0600
I agree with the large company assertion and the others with comments
about mass produced engines.
I know a couple of brothers that bought engines from O'Rielly. Both
350's (one for a Cutlass, one for an S-10). You would think with an
engine so common they'd have the assembly process down to a science, yet
both ended up with variations in rocker arms, rods and pistons, and so
on. It was ridiculous.
Granted most SHO engines haven't been gone through that many times, but
I'd still be wary. The best way to know it's put together right is to
find a local speed shop those in the know utilize and do as much of the
wrenching as you can yourself.
Justin
parted 92 - need something?
>>> Ian Fisher <dataflash@yahoo.com> 02/10 7:50 PM >>>
I was waiting for someone else to say something first
before I jumped in about Jasper.
I have heard some people who were not satisfied with
them. My take is that with any large company, there
are always going to be the happy customers and the
ones who complain. However, its the people with the
negative experiences that have something to say
(rightfully so) and it usually sticks in your mind.
Bill and I were talking about this earlier and he
reminded me that some gen3 SHO guys bought Jasper
engines when cams were failing. It was a long time ago
but perhaps someone can chime in about those engines
if they are in the know?
Ian
--- "James R. Balyeat"
<silver1995mtxsho@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> From my own experience, you will NEED that warranty
> if you are going with a
> Jasper remanufactured engine, I had a 2.5L Chrysler
> 4 cylinder engine from
> them and by the end of the warranty it blew a head
> gasket and was replaced
> by Jasper. The replacement did NOT come with any
> warranty! Also, being that
> the SHO engine is MUCH more complex than the OHC 4
> popper I had, I would
> seriously doubt it would make it through the
> warranty without the need for
> replacement like what I experienced. Just my $.02
> but I myself would not
> even consider it an option if the same situation
> were to arise with mine.
>
> James B.
> '95 Silver MTX SHO
> Removed Silencer Cone
> 87,000 Miles and Counting...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net
> [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]
> On Behalf Of Aaron Lowe
> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 11:59 AM
> To: shotimes@autox.team.net
> Subject: [Shotimes] update on my '93
>
> In case anyone was curious....
>
> My engine was indeed dead. I stressed about it for
> a few days before
> deciding that I am buying one of these:
>
> http://www.jasperengines.com/gas-eng.htm
>
> The SHO shall live again.
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free!
http://my.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Shotimes mailing list
Shotimes@autox.team.net
http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes