[Shotimes] Q: vented rear rotors for a 95?

[Edward Mazurek]

Thanks Ron...

I appreciate the info.

Ed

Ron Porter wrote:

>Different opinions, but my experience & opinion is that the solid rear rotor
>setup works just fine on the track with the '96 front upgrade, and with the
>bias pugs that make the rears actually do some work.
>
>Immediately after a track session at Blackhawk, the front calipers were
>700F, the rears 550F, and I've never warped, nor had any other issues, with
>the rear solid rotors.
>
>Combined with the limited availability of pads that fit the early-style
>calipers with the vented rotors, I can see no benefit to the swap.
>
>Ron Porter
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]
>On Behalf Of Edward Mazurek
>Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 2:15 PM
>To: SHOTimes
>Subject: [Shotimes] Q: vented rear rotors for a 95?
>
>Hi,
>
>I saw it mentioned in the forum that the G1s had vented rear rotors.
>I have a 95 and I'm planning on replacing my rotors and was wondering
>if I could get some of those instead. Is there any benefit? Is it
>a simple swap or do I need need calipers/brackets/etc.??
>
>Thanks,
>
>Ed Mazurek
>_______________________________________________
>Shotimes mailing list
>Shotimes@autox.team.net
>http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes