[Shotimes] 89 sho dyno charts posted
Bill Murray
fordsho@cloud9grafx.com
Tue, 7 Jun 2005 07:19:21 -0600
I wonder if the dynomax is holding back power. Bob Bruce gained a decent amount of power when he went to the full 2.5 ich catback, and that was with stock cams. Isn't the dynomax only 2.25"?
Bill Murray
-----Original Message-----
From: "Justin Schick" <jschick@aafp.org>
Date: 06/06/05 11:06 PM
To: <shotimes@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [Shotimes] 89 sho dyno charts posted
Don,
I've seen a few dyno graphs in my day but am no means adept at deciphering them, and am staring at a so-so laptop LCD. What happened to the performance seems to be what I'd expect with what mods were made. The intake path was opened up and the powerband moved up in the RPM range. The torque curve is now flat as Kansas and great for a track car. This is what I see:
old
max HP = 205 @ 6200
max TQ = 195 @ 4750
new
max HP = 220 @ 6750
max TQ = 190 @ 3500 - 4000, 4750 - 6000
red (the first run) was better and more rich.
If you want off idle torque, give it about 6 psi or another half liter of displacement! =)
Justin
parted 92 - need something (like an intake?)?
>>> Donald Mallinson <dmall@mwonline.net> 6/6/2005 7:45 PM >>>
I finally got the prints of my dyno test of the new .20 cam setup. So I
don't use up bandwidth, I have put the dyno charts up on the shoclub.com
web site. here is a short link:
http://makeashorterlink.com/?A2625163B
I could not get the new charts on disk so I had to scan all of them.
to my way of thinking, this is a much weaker engine than before.
What can I do to get some power back...basically what I see is that
unless I want the engine to live above 6000 rpm, I am have gone way
backwards in torque and HP.
Exactly NOT what I wanted.
Reminder. The engine was basically a BOS with a Pro Flow 77mm with no
chip. Ran great.
Now same except with EH runners, BBB, Josh's .20 cams.
Engine is healthy.
What is it going to take to get back some of the power and torque below
6000 rpm except just putting it back to the way it was? I expected to
have to run the engine a bit harder, but this is not good what I see on
these charts.
any and all advice appreciated
Don Mallinson