cams in a 3.2 was RE: Re: [Shotimes] 89 sho dyno charts posted

[Ian Fisher]

Any speculation as to what kind of tq losses would be
realized with a bump in displacement? In other words,
if we can figure out an average of the percent of tq
lost across the rev band with +20 cams on a 3.0, does
anyone think that percent average would remain the
same or drop if running the cams on a 3.2 (vs stock
cams or 3.0 cams)?

Ex 1. 3.0 with x cams
Ex 2. 3.0 with +20 cams

y=average tq loss in percent (between ex 1-2)

Ex 3. 3.2 with x cams
Ex 4. 3.2 with +20's

z= average tq loss in percent (between ex 3-4)

is y<z, y=z, etc?

I know, it's a lot of guesswork but I've heard a lot
of people say that with increased displacement one
generally has more flexibility with playing with a
hotter cam. Just curious. I should be bumping up the
torque a bit with the new 3.2 but I'm wondering what
effect the +20's will have on the tq and hp numbers.

Ian


> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Justin Schick" <jschick@aafp.org>
> Date: 06/06/05 11:06 PM
> To: <shotimes@autox.team.net>
> Subject: Re: [Shotimes] 89 sho dyno charts posted

> 
> If you want off idle torque, give it about 6 psi or
> another half liter of displacement! =)
> 
> Justin
> parted 92 - need something (like an intake?)?
> 


		
__________________________________ 
Discover Yahoo! 
Stay in touch with email, IM, photo sharing and more. Check it out! 
http://discover.yahoo.com/stayintouch.html