[Shotimes] rear spoiler

[Zach Leahy]

Oh yeah, that was my short answer.  It looks cool, but if it generated
any amount of force, it'd smash your trunkild.

Z

On 6/22/05, Dave Kegel <d.kegel@comcast.net> wrote:
> Leave it off.  I doubt it has any functional effect whatsoever, and no
> spoiler is what makes the 92's unique.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: shotimes-admin@autox.team.net [mailto:shotimes-admin@autox.team.net]
> On Behalf Of van Oss
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 12:22 PM
> To: shotimes@autox.team.net
> Subject: [Shotimes] rear spoiler
> 
> 
> My 92 came without a rear spoiler.  I have one on hand in the correct color
> and am debating whether to install it.
> 
> There is only one place I've wanted some rear downforce, at the entry to
> turn 1 at Brainerd.  At the end of that mile-long straight, the rear end
> feels awfully light to me.
> 
> On the other hand, I have no aesthetic interest in a spoiler and I only go
> to Brainerd about once a year.
> 
> I know this is partly subjective, but I'm soliciting your opinions.  Thanks.
> 
> VO
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes