[Shotimes] don's cams, a report
Ian Fisher
dataflash@yahoo.com
Fri, 30 Sep 2005 15:31:55 -0700 (PDT)
If that is the case, why not exchange them for another
set? It seems like using adjustable sprockets won't
get them timed properly very easily. If they are
incorrect to start with adjustable sprockets will only
get you so far...
This is interesting. Keep us posted. My +20 cams are
installed in my 3.2 which is waiting to be installed
sometime this month.
Ian
--- Donald Mallinson <dmall@mwonline.net> wrote:
> Many of you may remember that Josh's +20 cams were
> installed in my '89
> along with EH intake and BBB. Dyno testing showed
> Zero HP gain (maybe 2
> hp at most) and a loss across the board of 15+ lb
> ft. HP was also lower
> than before until rpm's got to 6500 rpm!
>
> The car is in Douglasville and Doug Lewis reported
> last night that the
> cams WERE timed correctly according to the cam belt,
> sprockets etc.
> That was the first question we had.
>
> What he found out right away is that the cams were
> ground way off from
> straight up. Two of them were 11 and 12 degrees off
> one direction, and
> two were off 9 and 4 degrees the other direction (I
> think) so he has
> installed adjustable sprockets and will properly
> time the cams and see
> what happens.
>
> Just thought I would report that the initial
> installation was OK, done
> by Mike Kopstain and friends.
>
> Anxiously awaiting good news from the next dyno
> session!
>
> Don Mallinson
> _______________________________________________
> Shotimes mailing list
> Shotimes@autox.team.net
> http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo/shotimes
>
______________________________________________________
Yahoo! for Good
Donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.
http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate3/